Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: an integrated view

Abstract

This study addresses an apparent disconnect between two views of strategic action: the ‘economic view,’ which contends that industry structure is the primary influence on strategic action, and the ‘cognitive view,’ which suggests that managerial cognition drives strategic action. We argue that this disconnect has created artificial boundaries between the two perspectives and has limited our ability to develop holistic explanations of strategic action. In response, we develop an integrated model that answers two questions: 1) Does industry context affect managerial cognition? 2) Does managerial cognition mediate the relationship between industry context and strategic responses to environmental changes? To examine these questions, we study the relationship between industry velocity, the structure of top management's cognitive representation of the environment, and the speed of response to environmental events. We find that industry velocity influences the structure of cognitive representations, which in turn influence the speed of response to environmental events. These results support our contention that both industry and cognition variables are critical in developing explanations of strategic actions. These results have implications for our understanding of the development of top managers' beliefs, the relationship between beliefs and action, and the nature of the complex relationship between industry context, managerial cognition, and strategic action. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Corporate Philanthropic Responses to Emergent Human Needs: The Role of Organizational Attention Focus

“…Thus, an identity-driven, attention-based perspective can help explain how patterns of organizational attention focus relate to the likelihood of organizational philanthropic action in response to a specific human need. Organizational attention focus refers to the elements of the organization and its environment that feature most prominently in the attention hierarchy of organization management (Davenport and Beck 2001;Nadkarni and Barr 2008). Patterns of attention focus vary in systematic ways across organizations and are relatively stable predictors of organizational action because they are rooted in organizational identity (Hoffman and Ocasio 2001).…”

Entrepreneurial Cognition

“…Top-down attention allocation allows managers to attain predictability, efficiency, and reliability by focusing attention on environmental features that they believe to yield possible opportunities. In addition, these managers do attend less to features that are not believed to be important (Nadkarni and Barr 2008). Incremental environmental changes refer to changes in consumer preferences, design elements, competitive dynamics, and institutions that are in line with the firm's present trajectory and require few modifications in how product components are combined and connected into a "big picture" (Henderson and Clark 1990).…”

¿influye La Personalidad De Los Directivos De Pymes en Los Resultados Exportadores?

“…Con respecto a los directivos, estos siguen modelos psicológicos que influyen en la forma de percibir el entorno y afectan a su toma de decisiones (Johnson & Hoopes, 2003;Nadkarni & Barr, 2008). Las creencias y valores individuales ejercen una influencia importante en la creación de las opiniones y modelos mentales de los directivos (Hambrick, 2007;Soriano & Castrogiovanni, 2012).…”