There is a long history of avian haemosporidian parasites being used to address ecological and evolutionary questions (e.g. Hamilton and Zuk, 1982;Norris et al., 1994;McCurdy et al., 1998). Since the development of PCR techniques allowing molecular identification of haemosporidians from avian blood samples in the early 2000s (Bensch et al., 2000), however, there has been an explosion in our understanding of the species-and genus-level diversity within these parasites (Clark et al., 2014). Recent papers continue to add new lineages to the avian haemosporidian phylogeny but the focus is less on uncovering diversity and increasingly on understanding how this diversity has come about (e.g. Fecchio et al., 2018). Not surprisingly though, the system continually reminds researchers just how complex it is, and at times, seems unwilling to share its secrets.This collection of eight papers published in Parasitology in 2017 and 2018 encompasses and highlights the range and importance of ecological parasitology in understanding the factors that drive diversity among avian haemosporidians. Specifically, these papers highlight the diversity of avian malaria parasites, and the range of ecological questions this system can be used to address. We have broadly classified these papers into two collections: (1) basic biology of host/parasite systems and (2) ecological and evolutionary diversity.One of the take-home messages from this body of work is that, collectively, these papers show the variety of questions that can be addressed using avian haemosporidians as a system, but simultaneously, they show what questions remain unanswered. Many of these studies have uncovered previously unknown lineages (possibly species) of haemosporidians and most have tried to answer questions about mechanisms to explain how this diversity has arisen. Strikingly however, each study that has explicitly addressed factors to explain haemosporidian diversification has concluded that a multitude of other factors needs to be considered, leaving the field with more follow-up questions. This has led to a dramatic increase in known haemosporidian diversity but also to incremental advances in our understanding of the factors that drive the generation of this diversity. We hope that as we synthesize the many contributions of authors to the advancement of this field, we can spur more collaborative investigations of the 'why and how'.