2011
DOI: 10.3354/meps09259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental determinants of motile cryptofauna on an eastern Pacific coral reef

Abstract: Coral reef cryptofauna, which live hidden within reef framework structures, are considered to be the most diverse group of coral reef metazoans. They likely comprise more biomass than all surface fauna, providing food sources for fishes and playing important roles as predators, herbivores, detritivores, filter feeders, and scavengers. In an era of global change, it is necessary to determine how these communities are structured across reef habitats as well as to understand how reef framework degradation will im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, managers targeting both ecosystem function and species diversity need to preserve degraded rubble environments in addition to pristine stands of live coral, as these different habitats provide unique and valuable ecosystem services. The high diversity of communities associated with rubble coupled with the elevated abundances of individuals associated with frameworks of intermediate degradation support the concept that artificial reef structures may be powerful tools for remediation of reef habitat loss, provided that they are of sufficient structural complexity [18].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, managers targeting both ecosystem function and species diversity need to preserve degraded rubble environments in addition to pristine stands of live coral, as these different habitats provide unique and valuable ecosystem services. The high diversity of communities associated with rubble coupled with the elevated abundances of individuals associated with frameworks of intermediate degradation support the concept that artificial reef structures may be powerful tools for remediation of reef habitat loss, provided that they are of sufficient structural complexity [18].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 77%
“…In reality, the dynamics of reef ecological function, biodiversity, and the physical integrity of framework structures vary across differing spatiotemporal scales, making them difficult to discern as a function of live coral. For instance, recent field experiments have shown that the presence of live coral has no effect on the abundances, biomass, or diversity of the motile cryptic fauna inhabiting the frameworks immediately below [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we found no correlation between the presence or abundance of obligate coral-dwellers on dead corals and the local abundance of live branching corals between or within the atolls. Similarly Enochs et al (2011) found that live coral cover had no significant affect on the motile cryptofauna occupying dead corals, but rather dead coral porosity (gaps in rubble structure) and water flow had a greater affect, with low-porosity, slow-flow environments supporting a higher abundance and biomass of motile cryptofauna. Idjadi and Edmunds (2006) also observed no significant correlation with live coral cover or diversity and cryptofauna diversity, but there was a significant positive correlation between reef structural complexity and cryptofauna diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…apogonids, grammistids, blenniids, muraenids; Glynn 2006) attain maximum abundances in highly degraded reef frameworks and coral rubble habitats (Enochs & Manzello 2012b). These potential prey are more accessible to excavating macropredators, such as turtles, reef sharks, balistids, labrids, tetraodontids and carangids (Glynn 2008) in degraded and unstable substrates of lower porosity compared with intact reef frameworks (Enochs et al 2011). The speciesrich motile cryptofauna may also persist long after coral mortality (Enochs 2012), providing a constant food source during coral reef recovery.…”
Section: Patterns In Community Diversitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Community-wide fish species richness would be expected to increase at some intermediate level of disturbance when diverse resources are available for different trophic guilds. In light of the demonstrated high abundances and persistence of motile cryptofaunal communities in degraded pocilloporid frameworks and rubble (Enochs et al 2011, Enochs 2012, Enochs & Manzello 2012a, we also assessed temporal variations in the densities of mixed diet feeders and benthic invertivore fish guilds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%