Environmental DNA improves Eastern Hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) detection over conventional sampling methods

Abstract

Effective conservation planning relies on accurate species detection. However, conventional sampling methods used for detecting rare and cryptic aquatic species suffer from low probabilities of detection. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as an innovative and powerful sampling tool for detecting aquatic species, with previous studies suggesting a detection advantage over conventional sampling. However, comparative studies often fail to consider the appropriate sampling frameworks to adequately compare sampling methodologies and account for the influence of environmental variables on eDNA detection probabilities. In this study, we paired two detection methods (eDNA and physical sampling) at 22 sites in West Virginia, USA, to compare the probability of detecting a cryptic, elusive, and imperiled species of giant salamander, the Eastern Hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis). We used a multimethod occupancy modeling framework to compare method-specific detection probabilities using a suite of predictor variables based on environmental conditions thought to influence hellbender detection. We detected hellbenders at 19/22 sites using eDNA and at 13/22 sites using physical sampling methods. The best supported model indicated that detection probability for eDNA (0.84 ± 0.06) was three times higher than conventional methods (0.28 ± 0.07). Water turbidity was the best predictor of hellbender detection and negatively impacted our ability to detect eDNA. We failed to detect an association between eDNA concentration and hellbender catch per unit effort. Our study supports previous findings that suggest eDNA sampling methods greatly increase the probability of detecting aquatic species. However, with little known about the influence of environmental variables on eDNA detection, our results highlight the negative influence turbidity and other physiochemical factors have on eDNA detection and suggest that further research on eDNA detection in turbid environments is needed. | 87 WINELAND Et AL.

Applications of eDNA Metabarcoding for Vertebrate Diversity Studies in Northern Colombian Water Bodies

“…Figure 7 supports in part this idea, showing that there is a small but significant correlation between filtered volume and total species detected (R = 0.43, p = 0.0081) and also is in accordance with literature (Leduc et al, 2019). Other studies used vacuum pumps or peristaltic pumps instead of manual pumps or syringes like the one used here, since it would increase the amount of filtered water used (Hunter et al, 2015;Baker et al, 2018;Leduc et al, 2019;Wineland et al, 2019).…”

Accounting for false positive detections in occupancy studies based on environmental DNA: A case study of a threatened freshwater fish (Galaxiella pusilla)

“…Our results add to a growing body of literature illustrating that, despite the fact that eDNA detection probabilities are almost always less than one, eDNA sampling can achieve similar (or greater) detection probabilities than traditional sampling methods (Lugg et al., 2017; Smart, Tingley, Weeks, Van Rooyen, & McCarthy, 2015; Wineland et al., 2019; Wittwer et al., 2018). The mean probability of detecting G. pusilla eDNA in a single water sample was only slightly lower than the probability of detecting one or more G. pusilla individuals in 30 min of dip netting.…”

Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation

“…Molecular assessments of diversity, using rule-of-thumb sequence divergence thresholds in mtDNA, can be applied to screen for candidate species to be confirmed by integrative taxonomy approaches. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a complementary or even alternative tool for monitoring amphibian species composition and has been particularly successful for secretive and rare species (e.g., hellbenders, Wineland et al, 2019). With improvements in sampling design (Goldberg, Strickler, & Fremier, 2018) and proof-of-concept studies for tropical batrachofauna (Bálint et al, 2018), eDNA metabarcoding has the potential to advance biodiversity assessment as well as long-term monitoring over large spatial scales.…”