Environmental DNA reflects spatial distribution of a rare turtle in a lentic wetland assisted colonization site

Abstract

Conservation translocations require robust post‐release monitoring to evaluate their success, which can be challenging to implement and maintain. Monitoring techniques that can account for the dispersal and cryptic nature of translocated animals are necessary to provide critical information on persistence and distribution. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive environmental DNA (eDNA) assay specific to the critically endangered western swamp turtle (Pseudemydura umbrina), a species currently undergoing trials of assisted colonization. Actively filtering sufficient volumes of water in lentic systems is difficult due to high concentrations of clogging particulates, therefore we assessed the viability of passive sampling in a controlled environment by submerging filter membranes and directly extracting DNA. Active sampling detected P. umbrina with a 97.6% detection rate, whereas passive sampling resulted in an 8.3% detection rate. We then used a fine‐scale eDNA sampling design and radio‐tracked translocated P. umbrina at the assisted colonization wetland to investigate eDNA dispersal and spatial monitoring resolution. We detected P. umbrina at 42% (7/17) of eDNA sample sites, and the probability of a positive eDNA detection was negatively associated with the distance of P. umbrina from the sampling site, indicating limited eDNA dispersal from the source. Systems with low natural mixing and limited eDNA dispersal provide an opportunity for high‐resolution spatial and temporal monitoring via targeted eDNA approaches. This is beneficial for monitoring rare species in these systems, as such high‐resolution results can provide insights into species presence, distribution, and microhabitat use.

Developing an eDNA approach for wetland biomonitoring: Insights on technical and conventional approaches

“…A common challenge affecting eDNA use in wetlands is that high sediment volumes can block eDNA filters, limiting the volume of water that can be processed (Goldberg et al, 2016). To date, active sampling has been shown to outperform passive sampling in a controlled environment that mimicked a natural wetland (Nordstrom et al, 2023). Meanwhile, increasing the filter pore size (from 0.45 to 6 μm) in a high-particulate wetland system increased the volume of water filtered (Goldberg et al, 2018).…”