2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-022-02048-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental DNA Sequencing to Monitor Restoration Practices on Soil Bacterial and Archaeal Communities in Soils Under Desertification in the Brazilian Semiarid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important aspect of effective management of rare species is noninvasive environmental monitoring using the molecular method of environmental DNA analysis, successfully applied and superior to the traditional fish survey (Berger et al., 2020; Boivin‐Delisle et al., 2020; Deeg et al., 2023; Dejean et al., 2012; Meulenbroek et al., 2022). The success of this method can be attributed to the fact that it is rapid and accurate, noninvasive and sensitive, relatively inexpensive and less labor‐intensive than other methods, facilitating the detection and management of specific species—including rare ones (Anderson et al., 2018; Jerde et al., 2011; Piggott et al., 2020; Thomsen, Kielgast, Iversen, Wiuf, et al., 2012; Wilcox et al., 2013, 2016)—as well as identification of entire communities (Araujo et al., 2023; Kelly et al., 2019; Li et al., 2018; Thomsen, Kielgast, Iversen, Moller, et al., 2012). It has also been used as a tool for the relative quantitative assessment of target species (Agersnap et al., 2017), fish communities reflecting internal ecological interactions (Yang et al., 2023), and restoring shifts in their spatial structure throughout lotic ecosystems (García‐Machado et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect of effective management of rare species is noninvasive environmental monitoring using the molecular method of environmental DNA analysis, successfully applied and superior to the traditional fish survey (Berger et al., 2020; Boivin‐Delisle et al., 2020; Deeg et al., 2023; Dejean et al., 2012; Meulenbroek et al., 2022). The success of this method can be attributed to the fact that it is rapid and accurate, noninvasive and sensitive, relatively inexpensive and less labor‐intensive than other methods, facilitating the detection and management of specific species—including rare ones (Anderson et al., 2018; Jerde et al., 2011; Piggott et al., 2020; Thomsen, Kielgast, Iversen, Wiuf, et al., 2012; Wilcox et al., 2013, 2016)—as well as identification of entire communities (Araujo et al., 2023; Kelly et al., 2019; Li et al., 2018; Thomsen, Kielgast, Iversen, Moller, et al., 2012). It has also been used as a tool for the relative quantitative assessment of target species (Agersnap et al., 2017), fish communities reflecting internal ecological interactions (Yang et al., 2023), and restoring shifts in their spatial structure throughout lotic ecosystems (García‐Machado et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect of effective management of rare species is non-invasive environmental monitoring using the molecular method of environmental DNA analysis, successfully applied and superior to the traditional sh survey (TFS) [10][11][12][13][14]. The success of this method can be attributed to the fact that it is rapid and accurate, non-invasive and sensitive, relatively inexpensive and less labor-intensive than other methods, facilitating the detection and management of speci c species -including rare ones [15][16][17][18][19][20] -as well as identi cation of entire communities [21][22][23][24]. It has also been used as a tool for the relative quantitative assessment of target species [25], sh communities re ecting internal ecological interactions [26], and restoring shifts in their spatial structure throughout lotic ecosystems [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%