Environmental enrichment alters organizational features of the forepaw representation in the primary somatosensory cortex of adult rats

Abstract

The cortical forepaw area of young adult rats was mapped by recording the response properties of small clusters of neurons in layer IV of the primary somatosensory (SI) cortex. First we quantitatively analyzed the somatotopic organizational features of the cortical forepaw representation in terms of areal extent and topography, receptive field (RF) sensory modality, size, and location. We also assessed the influence of environmental enrichment, known to induce structural alterations in cortical connectivity, on the representational characteristics of the forepaw maps. Long-Evans rats were housed in environments (standard, SE; enriched, EE) promoting differential tactile experience for 71-113 days from weaning. Within the SI, we found a single and complete topographic map of the cutaneous surfaces of the forepaw consisting of a rostrolateral-caudomedial sequence of digit and pad representational zones. Small islets of noncutaneous responses (NCR; high-threshold, deep-receptor input) within the boundaries of the cutaneous maps were a conspicuous feature of the forepaw map for SE rats. These islets created discontinuities in the representation of contiguous skin territories. In the SE rats, about 79% of the cortical sites activated by light tactile stimulation had a single cutaneous RF, whereas about 21% exhibited multiple RFs. Most single-digit RFs we delineated in the SE rats extended across two or three phalanges. As a result, the representations of the phalangeal skin surfaces were not segregated but formed an overlapping continuum. Moreover, within these regions, as the electrode was displaced in regular steps across the mediolateral axis, RFs did not shift across the digit skin surface in an orderly manner, suggesting a lack of internal topography in the finger representation zones. Tactile experience promoted by environmental enrichment induced alterations in the representational features of the SI cutaneous map of the forepaw. In EE rats, the areal extent of the forepaw cutaneous representation was 1.5 times larger than in SE rats. Indeed, the cutaneous map extended into NCR cortical sectors along its external margins and also into NCR islets found in the forepaw area. Consequently, in EE rats there were fewer representational discontinuities. The areal enlargement was due to a selective increase in the areal extent of the glabrous but not the hairy skin surface representations. Furthermore, protuberant glabrous skin (digit tips, palmar pads) was represented over larger cortical regions than were other glabrous skin territories less likely to be stimulated during object palpation and manipulation. Maps from EE rats were also characterized by a larger proportion of sites with single RFs (88% compared with 79%). In addition, glabrous RFs from EE rats were smaller and more clustered on the digit tips and palmar pads than were RFs in SE rat maps. RF size on hairy skin surfaces remained unchanged. Because the RFs were smaller, the cutaneous maps of EE rats contained distinct representations of digit phalangeal gl...

Nursing-Induced Somatosensory Cortex Plasticity: Temporally Decoupled Changes in Neuronal Receptive Field Properties Are Accompanied by Modifications in Activity-Dependent Protein Expression

“…A parylene-coated tungsten microelectrode (ϳ1 M⍀ at 1 kHz; World Precision Instruments, Hertfordshire, UK) was moved perpendicular to the cortical surface in Cartesian coordinates by a three-dimensional stepping micromanipulator (Märzhauser; Fine Science Tools, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Using the recording artifact generated by the microelectrode contact with the cortex surface as a zero level, we advanced the electrode to a depth of ϳ650 -700 m to record responses from small clusters of neurons (two to four) in layer IV (Waters et al, 1995;Coq and Xerri, 1998). Sites of electrode penetration were identified relative to the vasculature of the cortical surface.…”

Experience-driven brain plasticity: beyond the synapse

“…Diamond et al, 1964;Diamond et al, 1966;Volkmar and Greenough, 1972). Although not a ubiquitous phenomenon, morphological plasticity following exposure to EC has been demonstrated in several other brain regions that are involved in the processing and/or response to environmental stimuli, including the auditory cortex (Greenough et al, 1973), primary somatosensory cortex (Coq and Xerri, 1998), hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (Fiala et al, 1978;Moser et al, 1997;Rampon et al, 2000), amygdala (Nikolaev et al, 2002), basal ganglia (Comery et al, 1995;Comery et al, 1996) and cerebellar cortex . Initially, alterations in neuronal structure were the focus of investigation, however, more recently it has become clear that other components of the nervous system, such as macroglial cells and cerebrovasculature elements, also exhibit robust plasticity in response to experience.…”

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Investigate Motor Cortical Circuitry and Plasticity in Spinal Cord Injury

“…However, there is substantial evidence to indicate that so matosensory cortices are promising targets for inducing plasticity in these circuits. Decades of primate research have demonstrated the propensity for plasticity in somatosensory cortex that follows experience or practiced behaviour [107,108] cognitive factors of learning and attention [109][110][111][112], lesion of the peripheral or central nervous system [113,114] and direct micro-stimulation in the absence of peripheral stimulation [115]. It is notable that Belci et al [105] observed reductions in cSP and improvements in somatic percepts, effects that may be attributed to direct stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex.…”