“…Firstly, out of all long-term in-space spatial complexity change interventions ( n = 19), most studies ( n = 14) combined the inclusion of running wheels with a change of in-cage complexity from once to five times per week, showing the effectiveness of a 1 to 3-month intervention in stimulating neurogenesis ( Kempermann et al, 1997 , 1998a , 1998b ; Nilsson et al, 1999 ; Segovia et al, 2006 ; Hattori et al, 2007 ; Ramírez-Rodríguez et al, 2014 ; Hosseiny et al, 2015 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ; Sadegzadeh et al, 2020 ; Sakhaie et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Resasco et al, 2021 ; Cabrera-Muñoz et al, 2022 ). Regarding the remaining long-term in-space spatial complexity interventions, one study by Oatess et al (2021) investigated the effect of a single structural enrichment element (an acrylic tunnel), finding it was insufficient to affect hippocampal neurogenesis or markers of stress, two studies proved that a 6-month-long intervention for older subjects was effective with and without running wheels ( Freret et al, 2012 ; Neidl et al, 2016 ), a cohort study lasting 20 months demonstrated the effectiveness of the intervention in stimulating neurogenesis without running wheels and with the least frequency of changing in-cage complexity ( Birch and Kelly, 2019 ), and a 11-month-long intervention with combined running wheels and weekly changes in in-cage spatial complexity for 1-month-old subjects was effective in stimulating neurogenesis ( Hüttenrauch et al, 2016 ).…”