2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental factors affect macrophyte diversity on Amazonian aquatic ecosystems inserted in an anthropogenic landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, aquatic vegetation and abiotic factors are also related to Odonata structure of these habitats (Juen et al 2007, Borges et al 2021. For example, palm swamp and open habitats, such as degraded areas (Fares et al 2020), are diverse in macrophytes, which are used as oviposition site or substrate during larvae development of some dependent libellulids and coenagrionids species , Brito et al 2020. Notably, degradation level, biased sample methods and time effort between phytophysiognomies must also be considered in our results, since some species found in a specific habitat in our study were present or absent in other palm swamp and forest studies (Rodrigues et al 2018, Vilela et al 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, aquatic vegetation and abiotic factors are also related to Odonata structure of these habitats (Juen et al 2007, Borges et al 2021. For example, palm swamp and open habitats, such as degraded areas (Fares et al 2020), are diverse in macrophytes, which are used as oviposition site or substrate during larvae development of some dependent libellulids and coenagrionids species , Brito et al 2020. Notably, degradation level, biased sample methods and time effort between phytophysiognomies must also be considered in our results, since some species found in a specific habitat in our study were present or absent in other palm swamp and forest studies (Rodrigues et al 2018, Vilela et al 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As time goes on, almost all of them show an obvious upward trend. However, dominance of Eucapsis sp., Microcystis wesenbergii, and Anabaena osaquae might result in a decrease in numbers of others (Fares et al, 2020). Because these species in Cyanophyta assemblage has an effect on ltration, they are hard to be digested and also for the reason of that they release toxins, leading to changes in biodiversity (Yang et al, 2017;Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Temporal Variation Of Abundance and Biomass Of Dominant Phytmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower heterogeneity of canopy covers due to reduced riparian vegetation strata has also been reported elsewhere (Simião‐Ferreira et al, 2018). The increase in solar incidence in streams in catchments where land use change is intense can increase the amount of macrophytes, which in turn may increase the heterogeneity of perches (Elo et al, 2018; Fares et al, 2020). Perch heterogeneity may favour higher species diversity, including endophytic species tolerant to habitat alteration and exophytic species that select altered areas (Pereira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%