“…Many authors have suggested explanations for the temporal and spatial variability of stream CQ relationships. Such relationships may be controlled by organic matter and solute source mass distribution [Hood et al, 2006;Herndon et al, 2015], geomorphic regime [Kasahara and Wondzell, 2003;Torres et al, 2015;Ward et al, 2016], anthropogenic contributions [Basu et al, 2010;Thompson et al, 2011;Musolff et al, 2015], water residence time [Tetzlaff et al, 2009;Maher, 2011], subsurface flow paths [Anderson et al, 1997;Mulholland and Hill, 1997], seasonality [Butturini and Sabater, 2000], storm events [Hill, 1993;Kirchner, 2003;Zimmer and Lautz, 2014], bedrock lithology [Bluth and Kump, 1994;Hattanji and Onda, 2004;Nedeltcheva et al, 2006;Ibarra et al, 2016], and cation exchange [Clow and Mast, 2010]. Depending on catchment characteristics, stream solute concentrations can remain constant (''chemostatic'') or can change (''chemodynamic'') in response to changes in stream discharge [McDonnell, 2003;Andrea et al, 2006;Godsey et al, 2009;Thompson et al, 2011;Kirchner and Neal, 2013;Musolff et al, 2015].…”