1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1536(77)80146-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental factors limiting growth of Sporobolomyces roseus, an antagonist of Cochliobolus sativus, on wheat leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
2
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
35
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) might suggest parasitism, although we could not demonstrate this in vitro ( Supplemental Fig. S4); however, it might also suggest competition for nutrients because conidial germination in many B. cinerea isolates is nutrient dependent and P. aphidis outcompeting B. cinerea conidia for available nutrients would reduce disease severity (Bashi and Fokkema, 1977;Fokkema et al, 1979;Dik et al, 1991Dik et al, , 1992Filonow et al, 1996;Barnett et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…4) might suggest parasitism, although we could not demonstrate this in vitro ( Supplemental Fig. S4); however, it might also suggest competition for nutrients because conidial germination in many B. cinerea isolates is nutrient dependent and P. aphidis outcompeting B. cinerea conidia for available nutrients would reduce disease severity (Bashi and Fokkema, 1977;Fokkema et al, 1979;Dik et al, 1991Dik et al, , 1992Filonow et al, 1996;Barnett et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The differences can be ascribed to differences in environmental conditions. In 1986, high temperature and low relative humidity caused crystallization of honeydew substitute and most likely reduced the growth of the phyllosphere mycoflora (Bashi and Fokkema, 1977). Therefore, the effects found were probably caused by honeydew per se, whereas the moderate temperatures and the occurrence of dew in 1987 were conducive to growth of saprophytic micro-organisms, which confounded the effects of honeydew.…”
Section: ) C ( ---------) D ( ---) and E ( ----)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that lead to such great differences in epiphytic population sizes have not been elucidated. If epiphytic bacterial communities are limited in size by the presence of available and utilizable carbon and/or nitrogen sources, as suggested by recent studies (2,9,(43)(44)(45), then it might be expected that the availability of utilizable nutrient sources would vary greatly among leaves of the same plant and also among leaves of different plant species. There has been no detailed examination of the variation in leaf surface nutrient availability among leaves that would enable us to determine its contribution to epiphytic bacterial populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggests that microorganisms growing on plant surfaces could be competing for a limited amount of nutrients, which in turn would determine the microbial carrying capacity of the leaf. Depending on the system studied, carbon compounds alone or both carbon and nitrogen compounds were shown to be limiting factors for bacterial and yeast populations on leaves (2,9,44,45). Furthermore, Wilson et al (43) have shown that plants genetically modified to produce opines supported higher population sizes of opine-utilizing microorganisms than nonmodified plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%