2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Factors Predictive of No-Show Visits in Radiology: Observations of Three Million Outpatient Imaging Visits Over 16 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transportation is a key factor in addition to environmental factors that affect patient attendance and have value in predicting no-show. Factors including weather, distance, socioeconomic status and number of show in previous appointments [39]. These results con rm previous ndings by Dantas et al (2019) that lead-time and number of previous show/no-show are important factors in appointment attendance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Transportation is a key factor in addition to environmental factors that affect patient attendance and have value in predicting no-show. Factors including weather, distance, socioeconomic status and number of show in previous appointments [39]. These results con rm previous ndings by Dantas et al (2019) that lead-time and number of previous show/no-show are important factors in appointment attendance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Transportation is a key factor in addition to environmental factors that affect patient attendance and have value in predicting no-show. Factors including weather, distance, socioeconomic status and number of show in previous appointments [40]. These results con rm previous ndings by Dantas et al (2019) that lead-time and number of previous show/no-show are important factors in appointment attendance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This work contributes to the existing literature on no-show modeling in Radiology [3,9,15,21,22,24,[30][31][32][33] in several ways. First, by corroborating ndings on no-show predictors in previous works and compiling such results (see Additional le 4: Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%