2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental footprint of voltammetric sensors based on screen-printed electrodes: An assessment towards “green” sensor manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental impact of substrate materials and of the electrode materials must be analyzed. As already reported in the literature [ 183 ], paper, glass, and ceramics are the best options to reduce the SPEs footprint as substrate materials, while, considering the electrode materials, the substitution of noble metals with carbon-based materials reduced the corresponding environmental impact. It must be underlined that most of the biosensors mentioned in this review employed carbon-based SPEs, involving graphite, CNTs, or graphene as the carbon material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The environmental impact of substrate materials and of the electrode materials must be analyzed. As already reported in the literature [ 183 ], paper, glass, and ceramics are the best options to reduce the SPEs footprint as substrate materials, while, considering the electrode materials, the substitution of noble metals with carbon-based materials reduced the corresponding environmental impact. It must be underlined that most of the biosensors mentioned in this review employed carbon-based SPEs, involving graphite, CNTs, or graphene as the carbon material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…With increasing usage and integration of sensors, it is desirable to have materials that are biodegradable and/ or more sustainable to reduce the environmental impact, especially for single-use or disposable sensors. The use of non-degradable plastics and metals heavily impact the life cycle assessment of the electrode [6]. However, substitution of key components in printed electronics can negatively affect the electrode performance and stability, due to poor paste adhesion to the substrate and unexpected chemical reactions with the conductive electrode patch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common sustainable substrate materials, such as paper, cotton, and jute, either dissolve too quickly or have a high water intake, making its integration in water difficult [7][8][9]. Furthermore, the investigation of potentially sustainable materials for the conductive pathway often does not account for other chemicals used in ink and paste preparation [6,10]. Other parts of sensor fabrication, such as the sensor disposability and the influence on the electrochemical measurements after integration of new conductive path/substrate materials, are often not investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations