“…That is, this body of literature uses data concerning climate and VBDs (often preexisting data reinterpreted in light of climate change concerns) to justify a breakdown of traditional disciplinary boundaries. This is demonstrated by the striking number of papers in the climate-VBD literature that begin by affirming the reality and importance of anthropogenic climate change, before proceeding to explore its implications for VBDs (e.g., Patz et al, 1996Patz et al, , 2004Patz and Lindsay, 1999;Haines et al, 2000;Patz, 2000;Epstein, 2001aEpstein, , b, 2002Haines, 2001;Patz and Khaliq, 2002;Haines and Patz, 2004;McMichael and Woodruff, 2004;Watson et al, 2005;McMichael et al, 2006). Interestingly, this statement becomes more implicit than explicit in recent papers (e.g., Haines et al, 2006a, b;Patz and Olson, 2006a, b;Patz et al, 2007Patz et al, , 2008Frumkin and McMichael, 2008), perhaps reflecting the now less-contested nature of scientific consensus on the link between greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change.…”