2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Impact Assessments, local power and self-determination: The case of mining and hydropower development in Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Official tools, like environmental impact assessments (EIA), are used to determine if a mining project complies with socio-environmental soundness or not [5,15]. Despite EIA's key role in supporting decision-making in mining contexts, deficient assessments can arise from incomplete scoping of local needs, concealment of unsustainable mining practices [16,17] and feeble environmental policies towards mining [18,19]. Sustainable management of water resources requires an accurate deliberation of social-ecological impacts from mining, with the help of all the concerned stakeholders [3,5,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Official tools, like environmental impact assessments (EIA), are used to determine if a mining project complies with socio-environmental soundness or not [5,15]. Despite EIA's key role in supporting decision-making in mining contexts, deficient assessments can arise from incomplete scoping of local needs, concealment of unsustainable mining practices [16,17] and feeble environmental policies towards mining [18,19]. Sustainable management of water resources requires an accurate deliberation of social-ecological impacts from mining, with the help of all the concerned stakeholders [3,5,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even quite closed and technocratic environmental licensing processes can be (re)politicized if the public becomes aware of the project and begins to mobilize against it (Devlin, & Yap, 2008). Several case studies from Latin America's extractive industries provide evidence of the different forms of contestation used by local populations and other critical actors to challenge their exclusion from decision-making processes (Li, 2009;Jaskoski, 2014;Aguilar-Støen, & Hirsch, 2015;Walter, & Urkidi, 2017;. Thus, participatory processes can never be predetermined and their subjects can never be completely controlled (Williams, 2004;Cornwall, & Coelho, 2006).…”
Section: The Depoliticizing and Repoliticizing Role Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of Latin America's (neo)extractivist development path (Bebbington & Bury, 2013a;Burchardt, & Dietz, 2014), the critique that public participation is used to depoliticize development has been picked up by scholars of political ecology (Li, 2009;Jaskoski, 2014;Perreault, 2015;Aguilar-Støen, & Hirsch, 2015). In the region different forms of participation have been established in the extraction sector, especially since the neoliberal reforms of the 1990s.…”
Section: The Depoliticizing and Repoliticizing Role Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations