2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impacts of Australia's largest health system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicator provides a quantitative assessment of the total (direct plus indirect) CO 2 -equivalent emissions embodied in Australia's health system. This indicator builds on previous work 88,89 by constructing a time series of subnational multiregional tables from 2015 to 2017, featuring all Australian jurisdictions. As such, the findings presented in this indicator are based on different input-output databases from the ones used by previous studies in this space.…”
Section: Mitigation In the Health Care Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicator provides a quantitative assessment of the total (direct plus indirect) CO 2 -equivalent emissions embodied in Australia's health system. This indicator builds on previous work 88,89 by constructing a time series of subnational multiregional tables from 2015 to 2017, featuring all Australian jurisdictions. As such, the findings presented in this indicator are based on different input-output databases from the ones used by previous studies in this space.…”
Section: Mitigation In the Health Care Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australia's health system accounts for about 5.5% of the country's greenhouse gas emissions. 89 Multiple studies assessing the environmental impacts of health systems identify hospitals, pharmaceuticals and medicinal goods as key contributors for the bulk of the emissions of the health system 90,91 (Supporting Information 3.10).…”
Section: Mitigation In the Health Care Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Australian study by Malik et al investigating the carbon footprint caused by the whole health system of the state of New South Wales found that pathology and diagnostic imaging together accounted for approximately 9% of this healthcare footprint, 8 with the demand for imaging services per 100 people in Australia increasing by 9% over a five-year period. 9 The carbon impacts of pathology testing have been reported, 10 , 11 but to date there has not been a detailed analysis of the carbon impacts of the most commonly used diagnostic imaging modalities using a standard methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, unnecessary Vitamin D testing (> 3 million tests per year) cost Medicare more than $87 million in 2020 and a carbon burden equivalent to 28,000–42,000 kg CO 2 e or driving approximately 160,000–230,000 km in a standard, petrol-fueled, passenger car, yet provided no net health benefit for patients [ 21 ]. Lastly, pathology and diagnostic imaging account for approximately 9% of healthcare’s carbon footprint in Australia [ 22 ]. Opportunities for intervening in this context include turning off scanners to reduce emissions from standby power and reducing ordering of unnecessary imaging or substituting high-impact imaging (e.g., MRI and CT) with lower-impact imaging (e.g., X-Ray and ultrasound) to reduce carbon and costs [ 15 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent emergence of multiple studies estimating the carbon footprint of clinical activity and suggesting emissions reduction strategies via behaviour change [ 22 , 33 , 34 ], no reviews, to our knowledge, have explored the effectiveness of implemented behavioural change interventions, targeting clinicians, to reduce carbon emissions in health settings. To design and implement effective carbon reduction interventions in clinical care in the future, it is essential to identify and understand the nature and scope of existing initiatives internationally and the impact of those interventions have had on healthcare emissions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%