2006
DOI: 10.1021/es061117b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Implications of Municipal Solid Waste-Derived Ethanol

Abstract: We model a municipal solid waste (MSW)-to-ethanol facility that employs dilute acid hydrolysis and gravity pressure vessel technology and estimate life cycle energy use and air emissions. We compare our results, assuming the ethanol is utilized as E85 (blended with 15% gasoline) in a light-duty vehicle, with extant life cycle assessments of gasoline, corn-ethanol, and energy crop-cellulosic-ethanol fueled vehicles. We also compare MSW-ethanol production, as a waste management alternative, with landfilling with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated GHG emissions associated with 1 MJ of fossil fuel gasoline range from 2.419-12 g CO 2 equivalents; whereas for cellulosic ethanol, the estimated emissions range from 0.336-8.5 g CO 2 Eq MJ À1 of energy. Examining the percentage GHG savings described by the data sources, we estimated that the substitution of gasoline use with waste paper-derived cellulosic ethanol could offer GHG savings of between 29.2% and 86.1%, which is consistent with estimates from Kalogo et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated GHG emissions associated with 1 MJ of fossil fuel gasoline range from 2.419-12 g CO 2 equivalents; whereas for cellulosic ethanol, the estimated emissions range from 0.336-8.5 g CO 2 Eq MJ À1 of energy. Examining the percentage GHG savings described by the data sources, we estimated that the substitution of gasoline use with waste paper-derived cellulosic ethanol could offer GHG savings of between 29.2% and 86.1%, which is consistent with estimates from Kalogo et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Such studies typically account for the waste management of ethanol conversion co-products but do not claim carbon credits for these materials (Kalogo et al, 2007). There was some disparity between the emissions estimates from different studies (Kalogo et al, 2007;Chester & Martin, 2009;Shi et al, 2009), owing to varying assumptions on energy sources and process details. Therefore, we present our results in terms of a possible range of percentage GHG reduction per unit fossil fuel energy replaced.…”
Section: Ghg Savings Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification. Raw MSW would be classified into organic and inorganic fractions prior to use in an ethanol plant (29). We assume that preplant classification must produce an organic feedstock that would be acceptable for producing compost.…”
Section: Ethanol Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus identifying alternative sources of biofuel feedstock should be a high priority. In this context, ethanol produced from lignocellulosic feedstocks such as forest residues, grasses, and organic fractions of municipal solid waste (MSW) is emerging as an attractive option because of lower feedstock costs and higher potential for fossil fuel displacement and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared with corn-ethanol [4]. Although many lignocellulosic materials such as wheat straw [5], barley straw [6], corn stover [7], spruce [8], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%