2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Influences on Kelp Performance across the Reproductive Period: An Ecological Trade-Off between Gametophyte Survival and Growth?

Abstract: Most kelps (order Laminariales) exhibit distinct temporal patterns in zoospore production, gametogenesis and gametophyte reproduction. Natural fluctuations in ambient environmental conditions influence the intrinsic characteristics of gametes, which define their ability to tolerate varied conditions. The aim of this work was to document seasonal patterns in reproduction and gametophyte growth and survival of Ecklonia radiata (C. Agardh) J. Agardh in south-western Australia. These results were related to patter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the prevalence of E. radiata decreased in areas with mean temperatures higher than 20°C, consistent with experiments showing a negative relationship of growth of both microscopic (Mabin, Gribben, Fischer, & Wright, 2013;Mohring, Kendrick, Wernberg, Rule, & Vanderklift, 2013) and macroscopic (Bearham, Vanderklift, & Gunson, 2013;Hatcher, Kirkman, & Wood, 1987;Xiao et al, 2015) sporophytes at temperatures above 20-22°C. Our distribution records for M. pyrifera also match its survival threshold for gametophytes (23-25°C (tom Dieck (Bartsch), 1993) and the poor growth of adult sporophytes at 20°C (Buschmann et al, 2004;Rothäusler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the prevalence of E. radiata decreased in areas with mean temperatures higher than 20°C, consistent with experiments showing a negative relationship of growth of both microscopic (Mabin, Gribben, Fischer, & Wright, 2013;Mohring, Kendrick, Wernberg, Rule, & Vanderklift, 2013) and macroscopic (Bearham, Vanderklift, & Gunson, 2013;Hatcher, Kirkman, & Wood, 1987;Xiao et al, 2015) sporophytes at temperatures above 20-22°C. Our distribution records for M. pyrifera also match its survival threshold for gametophytes (23-25°C (tom Dieck (Bartsch), 1993) and the poor growth of adult sporophytes at 20°C (Buschmann et al, 2004;Rothäusler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dayton & Tegner 1984, Wernberg et al 2010. Ocean warming, particularly when coupled with other (potentially synergistic) stressors such as nutrient depletion and/or eutrophication (Russell & Connell 2007), ocean acidification (Wernberg et al 2009), increased frequency of storm or El Niño events (Dayton & Tegner 1984) and strong grazing pressure (Vanderklift et al 2009), is expected to erode the resilience of kelp beds via direct physiological effects (Wernberg et al 2011) and reduction of successful recruitment (Mabin et al 2013, Mohring et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Mohring et al. ), but physiological performance may also vary with latitude due to adaptive compensation at various biochemical levels (Raven and Geider , Wernberg et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, environmental controls may affect macroalgal performance differently depending on both the species and its biogeographic context. Many macroalgal species (particularly those at the upper extent of their thermal tolerance) are negatively affected by relatively small increases in temperature (e.g., Wernberg et al 2010, Mohring et al 2013), but physiological performance may also vary with latitude due to adaptive compensation at various biochemical levels Geider 2003, Wernberg et al 2010). Determining potential spatial or biogeographic variation in the physiological responses of macroalgae to environmental stressors is fundamental to predicting the likely impacts of environmental change collectively at the population scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%