Environmental Influences on the Development of Female College Students Who Identify as Multiracial/Biracial-Bisexual/Pansexual

King, Alissa R.

doi:10.1353/csd.2011.0050

Cited by 38 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Yet, in this past decade, scholars have taken a particular interest in understanding the experiences of those who identify with identities outside of the LGB umbrella. For example, researchers have steadily included pansexual students in qualitative (King, 2011; Vaccaro and Newman, 2017) and quantitative studies (Garvey et al, 2018c). Furthermore, researchers have sought to comprehend how asexual collegians navigate experiences during college (Mollet and Lackman, 2018).…”

Section: Who Are Queer- and Trans-spectrum Students?mentioning

confidence: 99%

A retrospective of LGBT issues on US college campuses: 1990–2020

Rankin¹,

Garvey

Durán

2019

International Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this brief retrospective of LGBT issues on US College Campuses: 1990–2020, the authors first review the extensive changes in the language used to ‘define’ people within these communities. Given the fluid and evolving language used in sexual and gender minority communities, it is crucial to examine how community members are named and who is centered as a result of this naming. The authors use the terms queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum to honor how individuals choose to identify themselves as opposed to placing them into socially constructed, fixed categories of sexuality and gender. Next, they explore how the climate has changed in higher education to support queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students. Finally, the authors examine the research on how queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students experience their campuses and the climate’s influence on specific outcomes. This retrospective contends that higher education scholars must continue to examine outcomes that will facilitate success for queer- and trans-spectrum student populations.

show abstract

Section: Who Are Queer- and Trans-spectrum Students?mentioning

confidence: 99%

A retrospective of LGBT issues on US college campuses: 1990–2020

Rankin¹,

Garvey

Durán

2019

International Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research with mixed-race people has traditionally utilized almost exclusively heterosexual samples and, with few exceptions (see Buggs, 2020; King, 2011; Thompson, 2000; Waring, 2013) has theoretically centered heterosexuality as if it were the only sexual orientation. The lack of research attention to LGBTQ+ mixed-race people means that critical mixed race studies (CMRS) theories about the intersection of race, gender, and sexuality potentially do not apply to mixed-race people who are LGBTQ+.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“I Wouldn’t Trust the Parents To ‘Do No Harm’ To a Queer Kid”: Rethinking Parental Permission Requirements for Youth Participation in Social Science Research

Sims

Nolen

2020

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Obtaining parental consent for youth to participate in research is a standard requirement in the United States. However, the assumption that involving parents is the best way to protect youth research participants is untenable for some populations. This study draws on interviews with 19 LGBTQ+ mixed-race participants to examine lay views of parental consent requirements for LGBTQ+ youth research participants. Qualitative data analysis found concerns about potentially outing LGBTQ+ youth to intolerant parents. Interviewees also asserted that adolescents aged 16 and older are competent enough and should have the autonomy to consent themselves. Finally, interviewees raised several methodological concerns regarding the biased research that may result from parental consent requirements. We agree with others that U.S. Institutional Review Boards should end uncritical requirements for parental consent for older adolescents and should routinize the use and study of alternative protective measures.

show abstract

“…Gender identity was evenly distributed among participants, with 49.3% identifying as female, 48.6% identifying as male, and 2.1% identifying as “something else.” Approximately 9% identified as transgender. The majority of the sample (87.3%) identified as homosexual (lesbian or gay male), 11.8% identified as bisexual, and 1.9% reported they were pansexual (attracted to all genders and biological sexes; A. R. King, 2011).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%