Environmental injustices in immigrant detention: How absences are embedded in the National Environmental Policy Act process

Abstract

The United States’ National Environmental Policy Act is a knowledge production process required by federal government agencies to assist in their evaluation of the environmental (and social) impacts of proposed federal agency actions prior to their implementation. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which manages immigrant detention in the United States, is included among these federal agencies. Using Texas as a case study, we explore how the National Environmental Policy Act process, as it relates to immigrant detention, systematically produces ignorance while also producing knowledge. We identify four forms of absence: absence of process in Department of Homeland Security’s use of Categorical Exclusions and programmatic Environmental Assessments, absence of actors in the exclusion of people who are detained as an “affected” social group, absence of alternatives in how “meaningful alternatives” are identified in Environmental Assessments, and absence of discourse with the public in the Environmental Assessment process. In addition, we consider how these absences reflect and perpetuate existing social and environmental inequalities.

Antiviral and Antibacterial Nanostructured Surfaces with Excellent Mechanical Properties for Hospital Applications

“…In Australia, there are 165 000 cases of HAIs per year . In 2019–2020, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) caused an outbreak of respiratory illness that was first detected in Wuhan, China. , Coronaviruses primarily spread through direct contact with infected individuals or by touching the surfaces where an infected person has sneezed or coughed. , It has been established that contaminated fomites or surfaces play a critical role in the spread of such viral infections. , Thus, the adverse effects that HAIs bring such as the mortality, morbidity, and associated costs are enormous.…”

Malleable detention: The restructuring of carceral space within U.S. immigration detention

“…This highlights the manner in which detention populations are made flexible to keep detention open and has implications for detention scholars interested in the experiences of detained migrants. Prior research has noted how the well-being of detained populations is often disregarded when detention sites are established (Edwards et al, 2021) and in their treatment inside detention (Bosworth, 2014; Terrio, 2015). Maintaining a flexible detained population can exacerbate migrant experiences of punishment inside detention, especially when migrants are detained in jails and prisons.…”

Thermal (In)equity and incarceration: A necessary nexus for geographers

“…Recent intersectional work has covered relationships between physical environments and carceral spaces, focused on several areas and international contexts. These include water, its management infrastructure, and health in carceral space (Jewkes et al, 2020; Turner and Moran, 2019), “green” prisons and sustainability in the United States and United Kingdom (Bohlinger, 2020; Jewkes and Moran, 2015; Moran and Jewkes, 2014), the role of nature accessibility in improving health (Moran, 2019; Moran and Turner, 2019), the role of temperature as a form of punishment in Russian prisoner transport (Moran et al, 2012), toxic pollution (Bradshaw, 2018), and environmental justice, broadly, and specifically in immigrant detention (Edwards et al, 2020; Pellow, 2021). More specifically, thermal conditions in prisons have received somewhat more direct attention in architecture and design work (Fairweather, 2000; Grant et al, 2012; McConville, 2000), while receiving some passing mention in carceral geographies literature (e.g.…”