2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Injustices of Leaks from Urban Natural Gas Distribution Systems: Patterns among and within 13 U.S. Metro Areas

Abstract: Natural gas leaks in local distribution systems can develop as underground pipeline infrastructure degrades over time. These leaks lead to safety, economic, and climate change burdens on society. We develop an environmental justice analysis of natural gas leaks discovered using advanced leak detection in 13 U.S. metropolitan areas. We use Bayesian spatial regression models to study the relationship between the density of leak indications and sociodemographic indicators in census tracts. Across all metro areas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile mapping of urban leaks in 12 urban areas in the USA combined with pipeline infrastructure information from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration suggest that methane emissions from gas leaks could be five times larger than the estimates in the US Environmental Protection Agency's greenhouse gas inventory [24]. Emissions from gas leaks were further found to be affected by sociodemographic indicators at the level of census tracts indicating inequities in system maintenance [25]. Nevertheless, analysis of top-down and bottomup inventories suggest that some of the discrepancies in the inventories may be due to diffuse methane plumes that could originate 'beyond-the-meter' at the level of individual buildings [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mobile mapping of urban leaks in 12 urban areas in the USA combined with pipeline infrastructure information from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration suggest that methane emissions from gas leaks could be five times larger than the estimates in the US Environmental Protection Agency's greenhouse gas inventory [24]. Emissions from gas leaks were further found to be affected by sociodemographic indicators at the level of census tracts indicating inequities in system maintenance [25]. Nevertheless, analysis of top-down and bottomup inventories suggest that some of the discrepancies in the inventories may be due to diffuse methane plumes that could originate 'beyond-the-meter' at the level of individual buildings [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Leaks can occur throughout the system, including at the interface with individual devices, contributing to global warming ( 23 ). In U.S. urban centers, areas with higher percentages of people of color, older homes, and lower incomes have been found to have a higher density of natural gas leaks ( 24 ). A recent study quantified methane released in 53 homes during all phases of stove use: More than 75% of methane emissions occurred when the stoves were turned off ( 25 ).…”
Section: Natural Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Weller et al (2022), this work notably includes other types of gas leaks, such as propane leaks. Nonetheless, I expect this recent work to strongly inform the results here.…”
Section: Race Neighborhood Disadvantage and Mobility Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of fires, not only are vacant properties at much greater risk for fire, but so are still occupied but deteriorated structures with mechanical defects (Keall et al 2010;Wallace and Wallace 1998). In terms of gas leaks, Weller et al (2022) argue that disparities in infrastructure quality is a key cause of inequality in neighborhood incidence. Similarly, substandard housing has been argued to increase the likelihood of carbon monoxide exposure (Landrine and Corral 2009).…”
Section: Race Neighborhood Disadvantage and Mobility Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation