2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09110-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental monitoring and impact assessment of Prut River cross-border pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the empirical analysis method, Wang et al [20] discussed the reasons that cause water pollution at political borders in China from the perspective of promotion incentives. Based on the evidence data of riverwater-quality data in China, Lu [21] adopted the triple-difference method to evaluate the impact of central environmental protection inspection on cross-basin water pollution. To analyze the cost effectiveness of reducing water pollutant emissions in the Jialu River Basin in China, a game theoretic simulation model was established by Shi et al [3] by taking into account the stability and fairness of cost allocation schemes.…”
Section: Research On Cross-basin Water Pollution Disputesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the empirical analysis method, Wang et al [20] discussed the reasons that cause water pollution at political borders in China from the perspective of promotion incentives. Based on the evidence data of riverwater-quality data in China, Lu [21] adopted the triple-difference method to evaluate the impact of central environmental protection inspection on cross-basin water pollution. To analyze the cost effectiveness of reducing water pollutant emissions in the Jialu River Basin in China, a game theoretic simulation model was established by Shi et al [3] by taking into account the stability and fairness of cost allocation schemes.…”
Section: Research On Cross-basin Water Pollution Disputesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acorde a las actividades que se desempeñan en las cercanías del río Jipijapa pueden llegar a generar deterioro del entorno paisajístico, enfermedades, disminución y pérdida de flora, fauna, contaminación atmosférica, erosión y degradación de fuentes hídricas, afectando los medios físicos, bióticos y socio económicos como los analizados en esta investigación, careciendo de programas de conservación hídrica, respecto con Bratman y Bená (2018) destaca en su investigación la intervención de la ciudadanía para la conservación de los espacios hídricos y disminución de prácticas inadecuadas, en comparación con Donoso (2018) en su estudio argumenta que la participación ciudadana en las actividades cotidianas deben de contribuir a la mitigación de impactos ambientales, determinándose como justicia ambiental en el que debe de estar enfocado los actores sociales e incluso gubernamentales como posibles factores de cambios, como los evidenciados en estudios relacionados como los de (Qi et al, 2019;Ramachandran et al, 2019;González et al, 2020;Neamtu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Tablaunclassified
“…Solving these challenges (maintaining water quality and protection against extreme weather events) must be done from the design phase of projects taking into account impact assessment studies (Neamtu et al 2021, SEICA 2019. The analyzed project is located in the northeast of Bacau on the left bank of the river Bistrita, as can be seen in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Study Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%