1989
DOI: 10.2172/5079498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental monitoring at Mound: 1988 report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water-sampling program at the Mound facility has historically measured plutonium and tritium at nine locations along the Great Miami River, as indicated in Figure 7 Carfagno and Westendorf {1974) 1974 ) 1975Farmer et al (1977Farmer and Carfagno (1978) 1978 Farmer and Carfagno (1979) 1979Farmer and Carfagno (1980Farmer and Carfagno (1981Farmer and Carfagno (1982Carfagno and Farmer (1984 1985 taken at locations 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8; during the period 1979 through 1985, measurements were taken at locations 1, 4, 6, 7, and 9. The water concentrations used for the simulation analysis were based on data from selected measurement locations, in an attempt to estimate the water concentration most likely to be associated with the fish being trapped near the Mound facility outfall (indicated by the dotted lines in Figure 7.3).…”
Section: 1 Aquatic-food Pathway Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water-sampling program at the Mound facility has historically measured plutonium and tritium at nine locations along the Great Miami River, as indicated in Figure 7 Carfagno and Westendorf {1974) 1974 ) 1975Farmer et al (1977Farmer and Carfagno (1978) 1978 Farmer and Carfagno (1979) 1979Farmer and Carfagno (1980Farmer and Carfagno (1981Farmer and Carfagno (1982Carfagno and Farmer (1984 1985 taken at locations 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8; during the period 1979 through 1985, measurements were taken at locations 1, 4, 6, 7, and 9. The water concentrations used for the simulation analysis were based on data from selected measurement locations, in an attempt to estimate the water concentration most likely to be associated with the fish being trapped near the Mound facility outfall (indicated by the dotted lines in Figure 7.3).…”
Section: 1 Aquatic-food Pathway Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%