2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(01)01031-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental monitoring of trace elements in bark of Scots pine by thick-target PIXE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, Čeburnis and Steinnes (2000) interpreted the high correlation coefficient among these elements as an indication of air pollution. When the obtained results were compared with those of Harju et al (2002) which represented an unpolluted region, Merimasku, our results were slightly higher than those given values. However, Schulz et al (1999) reported Pb and Cd values of 15.2 and 0.2 in an unpolluted area, Neuglobsow, and in the Thrace region their values were 12.9 and 0.16 respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one study, Čeburnis and Steinnes (2000) interpreted the high correlation coefficient among these elements as an indication of air pollution. When the obtained results were compared with those of Harju et al (2002) which represented an unpolluted region, Merimasku, our results were slightly higher than those given values. However, Schulz et al (1999) reported Pb and Cd values of 15.2 and 0.2 in an unpolluted area, Neuglobsow, and in the Thrace region their values were 12.9 and 0.16 respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Among these biomonitors, tree bark is known to absorb and accumulate airborne contaminants and has been therefore used for the monitoring of atmospheric pollution (Huhn et al, 1995;Böhm et al, 1998;Odukoya et al, 2000). Airborne pollutants are mostly accumulated in the outer bark of trees (Harju et al, 2002). Pine species can be found easily in or around big cities and close to other pollution sources rather than moss and lichen species, but there is a disadvantage in using pine species due to absorption of a certain amount of pollutants via the root system from the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher plants have emerged in recent years as a valuable tool enabling identification of environmental pollution (Markert et al 1996, Carreras and Pignata 2002, Klumpp et al 2002, Outola et al 2003, Schröder et al 2003, Adamoa et al 2004, Jackson et al 2004, Trimbacher and Weiss 2004. Increased metal concentrations and decreased pH values have been reported in the tree barks from the high industrial activity, increased urbanization, increased acidic precipitation and high traffic loads (Kuik and Wolterbeek 1994, Tüerkan et al 1995, Santamaría and Martía 1997, Böhm et al 1998, Pacheco et al 2001, El-Hasan et al 2002, Pacheco et al 2002, Pacheco et al 2003, Bellis et al 2001, Harju et al 2002. A problem exists with the interpretation of chemical data from the tree barks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nunes et al (1999) had reported 2,3% for P. pinea bark. In other pine barks values of 1-4% were referred for P. sylvestris bark (Harju et al 2002, Werkelin et al 2005, Saarela et al 2005, Miranda et al 2012) 1,8% for P. brutia (Akyuz et al 2003) and 0,5-1,2% for P. pinaster (Vázquez et al 1987b, Nunes et al 1996.…”
Section: Bark Fractioningmentioning
confidence: 99%