2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3804-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental performance of ordinary and new generation concrete structures—a comparative analysis

Abstract: The development of concrete technology results in a new generation of cement-based concrete such as high-performance concrete, self-compacting concrete and high-performance, self-compacting concrete. These concretes are characterised by better parameters not only in terms of strength and durability but also rheology of the mixtures. Obtaining such properties requires the adoption of a different composition and proportion of ingredients than ordinary concrete. The greater share of cement in these concretes caus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to focus on concrete with a compressive strength of 40 MPa and higher in this study was purposeful and in keeping with the project's unique setting. It is recognized that, in actual projects, designers frequently choose conventional compressive strength concrete, and this observation is well-justified [70]. The apparent disparity between this study's recommendation of higher compressive strength to align with sustainability aims and the widespread usage of 50 MPa (selected choice) concrete in actual projects can be explained by the multidimensional nature of construction decision-making.…”
Section: Percentage Of Reduction and Increase In Total Ec And Costmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The decision to focus on concrete with a compressive strength of 40 MPa and higher in this study was purposeful and in keeping with the project's unique setting. It is recognized that, in actual projects, designers frequently choose conventional compressive strength concrete, and this observation is well-justified [70]. The apparent disparity between this study's recommendation of higher compressive strength to align with sustainability aims and the widespread usage of 50 MPa (selected choice) concrete in actual projects can be explained by the multidimensional nature of construction decision-making.…”
Section: Percentage Of Reduction and Increase In Total Ec And Costmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The difference between the Ecopoint indicators is insignificant and amounts to 1%, which reflects the minor influence of demolition on the total environmental impact generated in the production processes of all components of the concrete mixture and steel. Despite the fact that aggregate generally occupies 60% to 75% of the concrete volume (70% to 85% by mass) [1,16] its environmental impact is dominated by the production processes of cement and, as in the present case, steel as well as other technological processes [13,22] that require large amounts of energy and affect the depletion of abiotic resources.…”
Section: Summary Of the Results And General Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other materials, concrete is relatively environmentally friendly; therefore, the eco-improvement of the performance characteristics of concrete must be multiphased and customized to the location of its implementation. The analysis of applied solutions taking into account the whole life cycle of the building object is considered crucial for concrete construction [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Therefore, the influence of design strategies on environmental and economic efficiency [ 8 ], as well as solutions favorable to the creation of an environmental profile, are being investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%