2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0956-053x(03)00087-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental performance review and cost analysis of MSW landfilling by baling-wrapping technology versus conventional system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They should offer proper information to the public and accurately recognize public preferences for landfill siting. They should then mitigate the negative impact on the environment or the risks that are identified by public preference (Baldasano et al, 2003). When the external costs remain in spite of the above efforts, compensation can be paid to the residents affected by landfills or the host community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They should offer proper information to the public and accurately recognize public preferences for landfill siting. They should then mitigate the negative impact on the environment or the risks that are identified by public preference (Baldasano et al, 2003). When the external costs remain in spite of the above efforts, compensation can be paid to the residents affected by landfills or the host community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, only k f ,u ∈ K u , which satisfies the applicability condition, Equation 17, for a given p l , is considered. The formula from Equation (20) means that the smaller q is, i.e., the smaller k f ,u is, the bigger the resulting robustness margin is. This rule can be confirmed by an inspection of data in the columns of Table 3, for any fixed p l , separately.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial expenditures on the purchase of stretch film constitute a high percentage of the total costs of this technology [12,19]. The decrease in the usage of plastic film means cost reduction, a decrease in working time [9,20], and less damage to the environment. An appropriate choice of the wrapping variables and parameters may guarantee the assumed conservation quality of wrapped bales without increasing the consumption of plastic film [9], especially if the optimal wrapping parameters are applied and the uniform or near-uniform film coverage on the bale's lateral surface is obtained [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to typical SWM approaches optimizing the operation of a certain SWM facility or the treatment and disposal of a certain solid waste type [e.g. 3,4], the ISWM approach analyses, optimizes and manages the SWM practices from a holistic perspective with considering the full array of solid waste types and integration patterns among different SWM facilities throughout the entire life of SWM process [5]. Therefore, the ISWM approach shows a higher applicability in the real-world SWM practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%