2018
DOI: 10.1111/roie.12382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental regulation and love for variety

Abstract: Using a model of monopolistic competition, we examine the relationship between intra‐industry trade and environmental regulation. The decisions on emission standards set by each country show strong strategic interactions. In closed economies regulations act as strategic substitutes, and in equilibrium there is under‐regulation relative to the cooperative outcome. Trade liberalization may lead to stricter or laxer environmental standards, depending on the consumers’ preference for product variety. In addition, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies of Haupt (2006), Cole et al (2010), Grether et al (2010), Roy (2017), and Echazu and Heintzelman (2018) support the idea that intra-industry trade (IIT) is less pollutant compared to other trade allowing to reduce climate change associated with product differentiation. These arguments are valid in the economic context of monopolistic competition (Krugman 1979;Krugman 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The studies of Haupt (2006), Cole et al (2010), Grether et al (2010), Roy (2017), and Echazu and Heintzelman (2018) support the idea that intra-industry trade (IIT) is less pollutant compared to other trade allowing to reduce climate change associated with product differentiation. These arguments are valid in the economic context of monopolistic competition (Krugman 1979;Krugman 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The introduction of this hypothesis aims to explore whether the agricultural intra-industry trade allows reducing climate change and GHG effects in the EU. Analysing the agricultural intra-industry trade on carbon dioxide emissions is still relatively scarce in the empirical literature compared to theoretical models supported by monopolistic competition (Copeland and Taylor 1994;Gürtzgen and Rauscher 2000;Haupt 2006;Echazu and Heintzelman 2018). On the other hand, most empirical works assess only the relationship between trade openness and carbon dioxide emissions, showing that there is a positive association between freer trade and greenhouse gas emission (Wang and Ang 2018;Balsalobre-Lorente et al 2019), based on the arguments of pollution-intensive production (Copeland and Taylor 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The theoretical models that consider the relationship between trade and climate change are explained in the monopolistic competition context. In this perspective, we selected the works of Copeland and Taylor (1994), Gürtzgen and Rauscher (2000), Haupt (2006), and Echazu and Heintzelman (2018), and Mehra and Kohli (2018). The selection of theoretical models is related to the fact that they formulate a set of conceptual assumptions that operate between two countries (home and host) with a structure of monopolistic competition according to oligopoly logic in which decision-making obeys a sequential game between countries regarding the use or not of environmental regulation.…”
Section: Trade and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%