Environmental Regulation for Transfer of Pollution-Intensive Industries: Evidence From Chinese Provinces

Abstract

How environmental regulations affect the transfer of pollution-intensive industries is the core issue of balanced regional development and pollution reduction in China. This paper analyses the theoretical mechanism of the impact of environmental regulation on industrial transfer based on the distinction between formal environmental regulation and informal environmental regulation. To this aim, the paper selects panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2008 to 2018 and uses the fixed effect econometric model to test the impact of environmental regulation on the transfer of pollution-intensive industries, then uses a threshold regression model to study the threshold characteristics and spatial heterogeneity of environmental regulation on pollution-intensive industrial transfer. The results show a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between formal environmental regulation and the transfer of pollution-intensive industries. The increase of formal environmental regulation intensity affects restraining and then promoting the transfer out of pollution-intensive industries. The promoting effect also shows the characteristics of first increasing and then decreasing, verifying that there are threshold characteristics and spatial heterogeneity. Overall, informal environmental regulation promotes the transfer of pollution-intensive industries and shows the informal regulation’s economic effect. The paper then puts forward the corresponding policy suggestions, including utilizing clean energy-saving technologies in the industrial sector, which is incredibly significant to realize the coordinated development of environmental protection and economy.

Vertical financial disparity, energy prices and emission reduction: Empirical insights from Pakistan

“…Furthermore, the correlation is a positive one, meaning as electrification rate increases, renewables consumption of total energy consumption increases (Sun et al, 2020) and (Li et al, 2020).…”

Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China

“…First, prior studies found that environmental regulation can improve corporate environmental performance and affect the equity incentive mechanism of enterprises [ 43 , 44 ]. Thus, referring to Li et al (2020) [ 44 ], we used the proportion of regional pollution control investment in regional GDP to measure environmental regulation ( ER ) and added ER as a control variable to Equation (1).…”

“…First, prior studies found that environmental regulation can improve corporate environmental performance and affect the equity incentive mechanism of enterprises [ 43 , 44 ]. Thus, referring to Li et al (2020) [ 44 ], we used the proportion of regional pollution control investment in regional GDP to measure environmental regulation ( ER ) and added ER as a control variable to Equation (1). Second, because equity incentive plans may also influence corporate sustainability practices and environmental performance [ 45 ], we further controlled the dummy variable of whether the corporate implements equity incentive plans ( EIPs ) in Equation (1).…”

Can the Target Responsibility System of Air Pollution Control Achieve a Win-Win Situation of Pollution Reduction and Efficiency Enhancement?

“…Liu et al (2017) also found that stricter wastewater discharge standards reduced the labor demand and production scales of enterprises. Secondly, the installation of abatement equipment is widely used by many firms to reduce pollutant emissions (Becker, 2011;Li et al, 2020). Thirdly, the "Porter Hypothesis" insists that appropriate environmental regulation will stimulate enterprises to carry out technological innovation and produce innovation compensation effect.…”