Environmental Regulations, Outward FDI and Heterogeneous Firms: Are Countries Used as Pollution Havens?

Abstract

We consider whether environmental regulations influence FDI outflows from a country with stringent environmental policy. We consider this issue by incorporating the predictions from the recent heterogeneous firm models of international trade into an empirical model of outward FDI by UK firms. We find that environmental regulations are not a robustly significant determinant of the internationalisation decision. In addition, we do not find robust evidence to suggest that dirtier MNEs are more likely to locate in host countries with lax environmental policy than cleaner MNEs. However, we do uncover systematic differences in the FDI behaviour of high and low environmental cost firms in other respects.

How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis

“…Instead, by looking at outward FDI by UK firms, Manderson and Kneller (2012) do not find evidence of a pollution haven hypothesis; in addition, MNEs with high environmental costs do not tend to locate in countries with lax ER with respect to MNEs with lower environmental costs. Table 3 lists the papers reviewed in this section.…”

Long-term trends in steel consumption

“…In contrast to Aichele and Felbermayr (2012), several other empirical studies find no or only weak evidence for carbon leakage, e.g. Eskeland and Harrison (2003) and Manderson and Kneller (2012).…”

Unilateral Climate Policy and Foreign Direct Investment with Firm and Country Heterogeneity

“…29 We consider …rst the change in global emissions when moving from the baseline scenario to the no relocation equilibrium. As to the volume e¤ect, we can observe that:…”