2021
DOI: 10.3844/ajbbsp.2021.192.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Risk Assessment of Coal-Ash-Amended Soil Based on Continuous Planting of Pakchoi

Abstract: This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phytotoxicity of coal ash also depends on soil properties, with sandy soils being more susceptible to a phytotoxic response due to their low chemical buffering compared to clay soil (11). The toxicity of coal ash has also been studied in Brassica rapa (Pakchoi) cultivation, where contamination such as Pb, Cr, and Cu was shown in the soil, a characteristic of care for the food chain is that the edible parts of the plant presented higher heavy metal content than roots (38). Samples CF1 and CF2 presented an alkaline pH of 7.03-7.06 in their order, and sample CF3 showed a slightly acidic PH of 6.35.…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phytotoxicity of coal ash also depends on soil properties, with sandy soils being more susceptible to a phytotoxic response due to their low chemical buffering compared to clay soil (11). The toxicity of coal ash has also been studied in Brassica rapa (Pakchoi) cultivation, where contamination such as Pb, Cr, and Cu was shown in the soil, a characteristic of care for the food chain is that the edible parts of the plant presented higher heavy metal content than roots (38). Samples CF1 and CF2 presented an alkaline pH of 7.03-7.06 in their order, and sample CF3 showed a slightly acidic PH of 6.35.…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%