2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental risk mapping of pollutants: State of the art and communication aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the specific example, we assume concentration as a proxy of risk, therefore neglecting the variability of receptor conditions. According to Lahr and Kooistra [28,29], then this is an example of a contamination map. When no information on actual impacts is available, one may still combine different risk factors based on prior knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the specific example, we assume concentration as a proxy of risk, therefore neglecting the variability of receptor conditions. According to Lahr and Kooistra [28,29], then this is an example of a contamination map. When no information on actual impacts is available, one may still combine different risk factors based on prior knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mapping technologies become more and more routinely used, attention for the underlying methods of risk mapping and visualization is growing (e.g., [2,13,20,31,60,61]). Lahr and Kooistra [28,29] recently categorized the different types of risk maps that exist and reviewed the methods to make them. They distinguish, among others, between maps of contamination, (potential) exposure, vulnerability, and "trae risk" for single or múltiple stressors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It built on methods and remote sensing products developed for routine monitoring and reporting (Table 1), as well as recent case studies undertaken in the GBR [16,19], but focused on broader spatial and temporal scales (GBR-wide and decadal). In order to produce ecologically-significant risk maps, contaminant concentrations in river plumes must be compared to published ecological threshold values for consequences and effects [38], i.e., for "adverse ecosystem responses". Furthermore, bio-indicators for regional risk assessments must be related to the long-term survival of ecosystems, i.e., for example, to the death, immobilisation, growth, abundance and reproductive impairment of the local ecosystems [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%