Environmental, social, and corporate governance activities with employee psychological well-being improvement

Abstract

Background Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) engagement is expected to benefit corporations in terms of their efficiency and sustainability. The transformative change in management practices would not only provide support for employees but also bring about additional workload, which may affect employee psychological well-being. However, the examination of the relationship between corporate ESG activities and occupational stress is scarce; hence, this study aims to fill this knowledge gap. Methods In total, 110,351 observations were collected from 41,998 employees regarding occupational stress to reflect employee psychological well-being. The data were derived from 11 corporations in Japan from 2017 to 2019. Data on ESG activities were collected from the MSCI ESG database from 2015 to 2017. The effect of 1-year lagged corporate ESG activities on employee psychological well-being was investigated using a lagged variable linear regression model. Results Positive and negative relationships were found between corporate environmental activities and occupational stress. Activities that reduce water stress during operation and adopt clean technology were found to benefit employees’ psychological well-being. On the contrary, the program for reducing toxic emissions and waste lowered employees’ occupational stress levels significantly. Regarding corporate social activities, the improvement of job satisfaction or work-life balance was associated with occupational stress. However, corporate governance activities were found to have unfavorable effects on employees’ psychological well-being. Conclusion The effects of corporate ESG activities on employees’ psychological well-being are found. The managerial implications suggest that caring for employees’ occupational stress during the implementation of environmental activities is necessary, and the adoption of social activities could enhance employees’ psychological well-being. Notably, corporate governance activities are a stressor for employees; top management teams should pay attention to it.

Occupational stress: evidence from industries affected by COVID-19 in Japan

“…The employees were required to respond to the questions listed in the questionnaire provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [ 24 ]. Feeling or experiencing of active; full of energy; lively; angry; inwardly annoyed or aggravated; irritable; extremely tired; exhausted; weary or listless; tense; worried or insecure; restless; depressed; doing anything was a hassle; concentrate; gloomy; handle work; sad; dizzy; joint pains; headaches; stiff neck and / or shoulders; lower back pain; eyestrain; heart palpitations or shortness of breath; stomach and / or intestine problems; appetite; diarrhea and / or constipation; sleep [ 17 ]. The full detailed questionnaire is displayed in Additional file 1 .…”

Thick Data Analytics: A Detailed Analysis of Employee Job Satisfaction

“…Hardware and software products are among the five major components of the information technology industry, which also includes Information Technology Services (ITS), engineering and R&D services, ITES/BPO (information technology-enabled services/business process outsourcing), and Information Technology Services (ITS). If you look at how much money the firm generates from its goods and services, Information Technology (IT) accounts for 59 percent [15] of the total, followed by Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and engineering services (20 percent), and finally software products (11). (ten percent of the total).…”

Prioritizing Work Health, Safety, and Wellbeing in Corporate Strategies: An Indicative Framework

“…As such, HSW is a strategic imperative that organizations must respond to, including being on the "corporate agenda" as a governance and strategic priority [7]. The recognition of the broader impact of HSW also fits with concepts such as corporate social responsibility [6,8], license to operate [6], and legitimacy obligations, which also represent a shift away from the focus on risk and risk mitigation as it relates to workplace health and safety.…”