Environmental sustainability and gynaecological surgery: Which factors influence behaviour? An interview study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the various factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery and examine the differences between gynaecologists and residents.DesignAn interview study.SettingAcademic and non‐academic hospitals in the Netherlands.PopulationGynaecologists (n = 10) and residents (n = 6).MethodsThematic analysis of semi‐structured interviews to determine the various factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery and to examine the differences between gynaecologists and residents. By using the Desmond framework and the COM‐B BCW, both organisational and individual factors related to behaviour were considered.Main outcome measuresFactors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour.ResultsAwareness is increasing but practical knowledge is insufficient. It is crucial to integrate education on the environmental impact of everyday decisions for residents and gynaecologists. Gynaecologists make their own choices but residents’ autonomy is limited. There is the necessity to provide environmentally sustainable surgical equipment without compromising other standards. There is a need for a societal change that encourages safe and open communication about environmental sustainability. To transition to environmentally sustainable practices, leadership, time, collaboration with the industry and supportive regulatory changes are essential.ConclusionThis study lays the groundwork for promoting more environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery. The key recommendations, addressing hospital regulations, leadership, policy revisions, collaboration with the industry, guideline development and education, offer practical steps towards a more sustainable healthcare system. Encouraging environmentally sustainable practices should be embraced to enhance the well‐being of both our planet and our population, driving us closer to a more environmentally sustainable future in healthcare.

The carbon footprint of different modes of birth in the UK and the Netherlands: An exploratory study using life cycle assessment

“…Nevertheless, increasing awareness of both professionals and the public of the environmental impact of healthcare choices is essential if these tensions are to be resolved. 35 As caesarean birth has a three times higher carbon footprint than vaginal birth, without analgesia, the environmental impact of caesarean for non-medical reasons should be considered.…”