2021
DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-2/19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental taxes in ensuring national security: A structural optimization model

Abstract: The purpose of the article is to assess the optimal ratio of environmental taxes in the context of national security. National security is defined as a complex parameter of indicators of economic, environmental and energy security, sensitive to the impact of environmental taxation, according to the method of Kolmogorov-Gabor. The environmental taxes with the greatest impact on the three identified components of national security have been

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Attention should be paid to studies in which the authors searched for cause-and-effect relationships within the chain—between the pandemic, economic development, and the ecology of the region. In particular, proved that the introduction of the Dorst quarantine stopped the spread of the virus, but had a detrimental effect on the macroeconomic development of countries and their ecological development [ 36 ]; saw the prompt response of national governments to epidemiological and environmental challenges as a necessary condition for their respective countries’ sustainable development [ 37 ]; proposed an optimal level of environmental taxation that would ensure countries sustainable development while protecting them from epidemiological threats [ 38 , 39 ]; added energy security to economic and environmental, as it also was affected by the impact of the pandemic [ 40 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention should be paid to studies in which the authors searched for cause-and-effect relationships within the chain—between the pandemic, economic development, and the ecology of the region. In particular, proved that the introduction of the Dorst quarantine stopped the spread of the virus, but had a detrimental effect on the macroeconomic development of countries and their ecological development [ 36 ]; saw the prompt response of national governments to epidemiological and environmental challenges as a necessary condition for their respective countries’ sustainable development [ 37 ]; proposed an optimal level of environmental taxation that would ensure countries sustainable development while protecting them from epidemiological threats [ 38 , 39 ]; added energy security to economic and environmental, as it also was affected by the impact of the pandemic [ 40 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Rhemtulla M. ( 2021) in psychology, where scientists raised the question regarding an appropriate sample size in modelling to obtain meaningful results. The use of structural modelling in the study of tax behaviour (Samusevych Y. et al, 2021) allowed to reveal of new information about the impact of taxation on national security. The effectiveness of the approach in modelling consumer behaviour has been proven by Hair J.F.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their research aimed to analyze the impact of quarantine measures and the pandemic on further business development to ensure sustainable development. Other authors (Vasylieva et al, 2021b; Samusevych et al, 2021b; Tiutiunyk et al, 2021) analyzed the consequences of COVID-19 in important spheres of public functioning, namely taxes, informatization, digitalization etc. Among the negative impacts of the pandemic, the stratification of society and a significant psycho-emotional burden, which threatens socio-economic development, have been identified.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%