2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Transformation of the State: The USA, Norway, Germany and the UK

Abstract: Modern states underwent two major transformations that produced first, the liberal capitalist state and second, the welfare state. Each was accompanied by the migration of a previously confrontational movement into the core of the state. In the creation of the liberal capitalist state, the bourgeoisie could harmonize with the state's emerging interest in economic growth. In the creation of the welfare state, the organized working class could harmonize with the state's emerging interest in legitimating the poli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the possibility of countries deliberately choosing the role of being either an innovator or a laggard in environmental protection (e.g. the US, Japan, the UK or, more recently, Denmark) reveals a range of options that contradicts the argument of a general weakening of the nation state (Dryzek et al, 2002;Andresen and Agrawala, 2002;Weidner and Jänicke, 2002).…”
Section: Environmental Policy Innovation As Well As Regression Is Caumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the possibility of countries deliberately choosing the role of being either an innovator or a laggard in environmental protection (e.g. the US, Japan, the UK or, more recently, Denmark) reveals a range of options that contradicts the argument of a general weakening of the nation state (Dryzek et al, 2002;Andresen and Agrawala, 2002;Weidner and Jänicke, 2002).…”
Section: Environmental Policy Innovation As Well As Regression Is Caumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today they are especially important if it comes to explaining a political roll-back, or the under-exploitation of a given capacity. Examples are the US under Reagan and Bush (junior), Japan during the 'bubble' crises after the mid-1980s (Dryzek et al, 2002;Desai, 2002), the UK under Margaret Thatcher or more recently Denmark and The Netherlands after a government turnover. Sweden, on the other hand, experienced a comeback as environmental pioneer in the late 1990s under Göran Persson.…”
Section: Unstable Situative Factors: When Pioneers Give Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flawless implementation of specific environmental policies (at global, regional and local level) will be determined mainly by national policies and their commitment, institutions, as well as administrative and technical capacity (Dryzek et al, 2002;Meadowcroft, 2005;Sommerer and Lim, 2016).…”
Section: National Environmental Performance Addressed By Political Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that Germany takes a leading role in ecological modernization (see also [123]) while at the same time, automobile production is outstanding and the comparative employment in this sector is very high. Germany hosts several lead developers of diesel technology (BMW, Volkswagen, Daimler), yet unlike in other manufacturing countries which peak in Diesel technology, aggregate tax incentives for diesel have only been moderate with a resulting dieselization below the European mean (Figure 2, cf.…”
Section: Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%