2019
DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental variables that ameliorate extinction learning deficits in the 129S1/SvlmJ mouse strain

Abstract: Fear conditioning is an associative learning process by which organisms learn to avoid environmental stimuli that are predictive of aversive outcomes. Fear extinction learning is a process by which avoidance of fear‐conditioned stimuli is attenuated when the environmental stimuli is no longer predictive of the aversive outcome. Aberrant fear conditioning and extinction learning are key elements in the development of several anxiety disorders. The 129S1 inbred strain of mice is used as an animal model for malad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(191 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is furthermore corroborated by the finding that the baseline distance traveled was lower in S1 than BL6 mice, which indicates decreased home cage activity at the beginning of the light period. In agreement with this finding, reduced spontaneous locomotion and home cage activity in the S1 strain has been reported before (34)(35)(36). We did not observe spontaneous freezing in the S1 animals (data not shown, but also see no pre-CS habituation during fear conditioning) as food intake measurements were conducted in the home cage to minimize anxiogenic effects during the test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is furthermore corroborated by the finding that the baseline distance traveled was lower in S1 than BL6 mice, which indicates decreased home cage activity at the beginning of the light period. In agreement with this finding, reduced spontaneous locomotion and home cage activity in the S1 strain has been reported before (34)(35)(36). We did not observe spontaneous freezing in the S1 animals (data not shown, but also see no pre-CS habituation during fear conditioning) as food intake measurements were conducted in the home cage to minimize anxiogenic effects during the test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Disturbed sleep has been proposed as a possible confounding factor in the process of fear extinction and, thus, a risk factor for anxiety- and trauma-related disorders 29 , 31 , 54 , 55 . To investigate whether the S1 mouse strain, for which a severe impairment of fear extinction learning has been previously described by different groups 34 , 36 , 37 , 41 43 , 56 , shows aberrant sleep patterns at baseline, we examined circadian sleep/wake behaviors of S1 mice in comparison to those of typically extinction-competent BL6 mice. Within the present study, we uncovered profound differences between both mouse strains regarding the diurnal distribution of sleep and wakefulness, but also sleep architecture, spectral EEG features and sleep spindle events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C57BL/6 (BL6)] 33 , 34 , represents a prototype of this clinical feature 35 . The maladaptive fear phenotype of the S1 mouse strain is furthermore characterized by deficits in safety learning and high susceptibility to fear generalization to ambiguous contexts or cues 36 , 37 , which are also characteristics of anxiety-related disorders 38 , 39 . Moreover, compared to BL6, S1 mice show an anxiety-like phenotype as well as reduced novelty- and reward seeking and an altered neuroendocrine stress response 40 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, despite lack of extinction C57Bl/6J and 129S1/SvlmJ mice, cued threat memory seems to “fade” with time in males but not in females, as evidenced by reduced freezing during spontaneous recovery compared to the last extinction block. While beyond the scope of the present study, we hope that our findings will guide future work exploring the maximal perimeters required for assessment of threat memory dynamics within each strain (i.e., Cazares et al, 2019; Wimer et al, 1968) in order to better assess of the impacts of sex and estrous cycle. Finally, our experimental design focused on the contributions of estrous cycle to endophenotypes relevant to negative valence systems and offers little insight to sex hormone regulation of behavior in males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%