2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40728-016-0030-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Environmentalism of the poor”: the Tipaimukh Dam, ecological disasters and environmental resistance beyond borders

Abstract: The Indian government recently resumed the construction of the Tipaimukh Dam on the Barak River just 1 km north of Bangladesh’s north-eastern border. The construction work was stalled in March 2007 in the wake of massive protests from within and outside India. Experts have argued that the Dam, when completed, would cause colossal disasters to Bangladesh and India, with the former being vastly affected: the Dam would virtually dry up the Surma and Kushiara, two important rivers for Bangladesh. Therefore, this c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these would be incentivized to downplay resettlement data since larger resettlement figures can result in more controversy around a dam project (Tarrow 1994;Martinez-Alier 2002) and even a withdrawal of funding with the (originally World Bank-funded) Arun III Dam in Nepal being a case in point (Rest 2012). Meanwhile, project opponents would be keen to inflate resettlement figures to attract additional media attention which would strengthen their anti-dam-campaign (Islam and Islam 2016). We base our different categories of stakeholders mostly on the categorization by Nüsser (2003).…”
Section: Project Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these would be incentivized to downplay resettlement data since larger resettlement figures can result in more controversy around a dam project (Tarrow 1994;Martinez-Alier 2002) and even a withdrawal of funding with the (originally World Bank-funded) Arun III Dam in Nepal being a case in point (Rest 2012). Meanwhile, project opponents would be keen to inflate resettlement figures to attract additional media attention which would strengthen their anti-dam-campaign (Islam and Islam 2016). We base our different categories of stakeholders mostly on the categorization by Nüsser (2003).…”
Section: Project Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other linguistic data like social acceptance, site's distance from reserved area, existence of endangered species, availability of medicinal plants, sites within seismic zone and family displaced (hostile population) and their willingness for resettlement are studied by assigning a score as per guideline given by experts around the globe and those specified by Central Pollution Control Board, 2012 [ 15 ], and Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) guidelines for industries and impact assessment 201 [ 16 ]. Social acceptance or Not in My Backyard (NIMBY) impact of those selected power plants are analyzed based on different literatures survey [ 10 , 17 – 19 ]. The ANN is trained by referring to the important subattributes in Table 1 .…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, India is going with a plan to build its largest hydroelectric project, the Tipaimukh Dam Project on the river Barak, at the location where the Tipai River meets the Barak on the border of the districts Kolashib and Churachandpur of the states Mizoram and Manipur, respectively. Once the Tipaimukh Dam comes into operation (Bharatpedia, 2021), the free water flow of the river Barak river will be regulated, and this will have tremendous adverse effects on the ecosystem of the rivers Surma and Kushiara in Bangladesh (M. S. Islam & Islam, 2016). Assessment of the anticipated adversity would require reliable baseline data on the water quality of these rivers in the pre-dam periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%