Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art

“…[4]. Design problems of closed-loop supply chain networks involve a high degree of uncertainty associated with quality and quantity of used products.…”

Section: Previous Supply Chain Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling and Simulation of Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Economic Efficiency

Tanimizu

Shimizu

Iwamura

et al. 2013

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This study proposes a basic model of closed-loop supply chains which includes not only traditional forward supply chains for the generation of products but also reverse supply chains for the reuse of products in consideration of economic efficiency for MTO (Make to Order) companies. The model consists of four model components, i.e., clients, manufacturers, suppliers, and remanufacturers. A remanufacturer is added to the previous model of forward supply chains as a new model component which collects used products from clients and provides reusable parts to manufacturers. Remanufacturers as well as manufacturers and suppliers modify their schedules and negotiate with each other in order to determine suitable prices and delivery times of products. Remanufacturers stimulate clients to discard used products to meet the demand of reusable parts. They can increase the amount of reused products and reduce wastes by creating a balance between supply and demand of reusable parts.

show abstract

“…Information is valuable in order to min imise any uncertainties in activities that are related to remanufacture, such as purchasing new parts, inventory management and production planning, and scheduling [19][20][21]. The importance of informat ion fro m disassembly increases when remanufacturers deal with complex products [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Unique Characteristics of Disassembly for Various Product Recovery Methods with A Focus on Remanufacturing

Priyono

2017

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper aims to identify differences between disassembly for three product recovery methods: remanufacturing, recycling, and repair. Existing studies focus on disassembly differences for the three recovery methods from technical perspective only; those studies focus on the level of disassem bly and the method of disassem bly. This study covers various aspects of disassembly such as knowledge of worker, value of the materials, and interplays with other processes in product recovery. As many as seven products were used as case studies were undertaken to identify differences of disassem bly for three recovery methods. At the end of the paper, managerial implications are presented.

show abstract

Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art

Cited by 812 publications

References 525 publications

A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility

A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility

Modeling and Simulation of Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Economic Efficiency

Identifying Unique Characteristics of Disassembly for Various Product Recovery Methods with A Focus on Remanufacturing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About