The
removal of alkyl mercaptans via chemical means in the oil and
gas industry has received very little attention compared with the
much more extensive work on hydrogen sulfide (H2S) scavenging.
The removal of H2S from produced liquids, aqueous, hydrocarbon,
and gas is a vitally important part of the oil and gas industry. Typically,
liquid chemical scavengers are employed for H2S levels
up to approximately 5000 ppm. Above this, sequestering-type methods
are employed such as amine recycling units from which the H2S can be regenerated and used most typically to produce elemental
sulfur. It has been known for some time that mercaptan scavenging
is possible but anecdotally reported as being less effective than
H2S scavenging. This current study seeks to improve the
understanding of the efficacy and mechanism of mercaptan scavenging
by the common H2S scavengers in use today. A thorough literature
review is provided of the current state of the art in mercaptan scavenging
is provided. For the first time, a systematic series of quantified
scavenging performance results for a variety of prominent scavengers
with volatile alkyl mercaptans have been presented using the well-known
autoclave method. These results are directly compared with the corresponding
values for H2S under identical reaction conditions; overall,
the best product was 1,3,5-trimethylhexahydrotriazine (MMA-triazine).
The chemical structures of the reaction byproducts with alkyl mercaptans,
to date only suggested but never confirmed, have been proven by the
application of rigorous analytical methods. Results for both MMA-triazine
and 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)hexahydro-s-triazine
(MEA-triazine) reactions with ethyl, propyl, and butyl mercaptan comprehensively
show, via the use of GCMS(-EI) analysis, representatives from each
step in the sequential reaction pathway, containing each 1, 2, and
3 nitrogen atoms showing definitive evidence for the proposed reaction
pathway.