2014
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2014.943156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Envisaging agency as discourse hybridity: a Butlerian analysis of secondary classroom discourses

Abstract: Conceptualised from a range of sociological perspectives, and theorised extensively over the last 50 years, human agency is an integral element to lifelong learning. Poststructural theory with its decentred discursive construction of the learner offers a vibrant conception of classroom dynamics. This paper envisions how learner agency can be performative in the discursive space of a secondary classroom. The research disrupts the notion of a unified subject, a key tenet of sovereign theory that is evident in co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory of performativity conceives "identity as a paradox that is inherently unstable and revealing norms requiring continuous maintenance" (Hey,200: 439). This conceptualisation of identity provides grounds for agency to be conceived as contingent, non-unitary, complex and inter-discursive (Charteris, 2016). Butler (2009) argues that these norms are used to regulate people through a process of 'interpellation' or 'hail' (Davies, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of performativity conceives "identity as a paradox that is inherently unstable and revealing norms requiring continuous maintenance" (Hey,200: 439). This conceptualisation of identity provides grounds for agency to be conceived as contingent, non-unitary, complex and inter-discursive (Charteris, 2016). Butler (2009) argues that these norms are used to regulate people through a process of 'interpellation' or 'hail' (Davies, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency emerges quite apparently in well‐established educational learning theories such as social constructivism, where sociocultural interaction is encouraged and utilised (Lave, 1988; Reynolds et al, 1996). In the era of lifelong learning, agency is considered an especially important characteristic for students to develop (Charteris, 2016). Agency has a plethora of definitions that are often quite contested.…”
Section: The Role Of Human Agency In the Learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Free will’ is a common notion associated with the idea, but suffers as a thorough underpinning due to its failure to conceptualise the interacting elements of culture, beliefs and action (Ahearn, 2001). Agency, as a concept, is constantly in flux and is shaped by the discourses contained within the classroom or school milieu (Charteris, 2016). As such, it is situated and embodied within the sociocultural world of the student and the teacher.
Agency is at once the possibility of imagining and asserting a new self in a figured world at the same time as it is about using one’s identity to imagine a new and different world.
…”
Section: The Role Of Human Agency In the Learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibilities of students as active agents who resist assessment requirements is one that is not often explored. Student agency can be a fluid performance of power, where apparent resistance to teacher instruction can lead to students developing deeper understanding (Charteris 2016). In high performance cultures, student agency may not be seen as desirable, and parents and students may resist teacher efforts to move away from historic notions of the roles of teachers and students (Charteris and Thomas 2017;Evans 2013;Harris and Brown 2013).…”
Section: Students As Agents Reproduce and Transform Classroom Assessmmentioning
confidence: 99%