1957
DOI: 10.1021/jf60076a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic Analysis, Quantitative Determination of L-Glutamic Acid by L-Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (from E. coli)

Abstract: and 1.6 mg. of toxaphene-i.e., 106%was recovered. A 45-gram butterfat sample, to which no toxaphene was added, was carried through the same procedure and no measurable interferences were encountered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One merit of the present system is that no complicated procedures are required. For example, amino acids are commonly detected by chromatographic separation followed by derivatization , and enzymatic reactions . Both methods require strict control of experimental conditions and complex sample treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One merit of the present system is that no complicated procedures are required. For example, amino acids are commonly detected by chromatographic separation followed by derivatization , and enzymatic reactions . Both methods require strict control of experimental conditions and complex sample treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, amino acids are commonly detected by chromatographic separation followed by derivatization 43,44 and enzymatic reactions. 45 Both methods require strict control of experimental conditions and complex sample treatment. By contrast, the present method requires simple mixing and heating procedures.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucose was determined by the modified anthrone method of Ecker and Lockhart (4). Nonlabeled L-glutamate was measured by the specific decarboxylase-manometric technique of Seidman and Blish (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%