2021
DOI: 10.1097/psn.0000000000000376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic Debridement of Burns Reduces the Need for Blood Transfusions

Abstract: D ear Editor,Blood is a valuable resource that has specific guidance related to its safe and effective use (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015). In an effort to reduce the number of blood transfusions in our burn patients, we audited and changed our practice guidelines, resulting in a 100% reduction of unnecessary crossmatching investigations, thus increasing resources and reducing costs. Our previous practice guidelines recommended Group and Save (i.e., determining patient blood group [AB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies, now empirically supported by long-term experiences due to an increasing popularity of ED, have already stated several advantages in comparison to classic surgery [69,[93][94][95]. While surgery, which is currently the most frequently used method for initial debridement and commonly still represents the SOC, undisputedly offers a sharp and radical excision of damaged structures with-frequently-nothing left but vital tissue on the one hand, it is still highly traumatic, requires OR facilities with anaesthesia, can cause extensive blood loss, and nearly always requires skin grafting on the other hand.…”
Section: Results and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Early studies, now empirically supported by long-term experiences due to an increasing popularity of ED, have already stated several advantages in comparison to classic surgery [69,[93][94][95]. While surgery, which is currently the most frequently used method for initial debridement and commonly still represents the SOC, undisputedly offers a sharp and radical excision of damaged structures with-frequently-nothing left but vital tissue on the one hand, it is still highly traumatic, requires OR facilities with anaesthesia, can cause extensive blood loss, and nearly always requires skin grafting on the other hand.…”
Section: Results and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While surgery, which is currently the most frequently used method for initial debridement and commonly still represents the SOC, undisputedly offers a sharp and radical excision of damaged structures with-frequently-nothing left but vital tissue on the one hand, it is still highly traumatic, requires OR facilities with anaesthesia, can cause extensive blood loss, and nearly always requires skin grafting on the other hand. On the contrary, ED provides a more selective and aligned way for removal of eschar and, thus, avoids "collateral damage" to surrounding viable tissue, increasing the chances for conservative treatment options by leaving intact dermis with ability for spontaneous reepithelization [25,65,[95][96][97]. Eschar removal is perfectly aligned to the vital tissue, precisely revealing the actual burn depth even in complex heterogenous burn patterns or surgical challenging regions.…”
Section: Results and Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early use of this bromelain-based gel has been reported to result in rapid, selective, efficient, and safe (compared to standard treatment methods) eschar removal without damaging the uninjured dermis. At the same time, a decrease in the number of surgical interventions, blood loss, and even mortality rates have also been reported [ 19 , 20 , 22 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%