2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob and ethanol production from cellulosic hydrolysate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
86
2
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
86
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It had over 22% higher enzymatic digestibility and more than 6% higher reducing sugar concentration than the batch process during hydrolysis of high solidliquid ratio of 1: 0.5 (w/w). Our results are also in accordance with the earlier work of Chen et al, where in the enzymatic saccharification of corncob high hydrolysis yield and reducing sugar concentration was achieved through fed batch process (Chen et al 2007). In fed batch process, solid was added after the previous solid was completed or partially liquefied, which improved the mass and heat transfer significantly and generated high enzymatic digestibility and reducing sugar concentration.…”
Section: Fed Batch Enzymatic Hydrolysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It had over 22% higher enzymatic digestibility and more than 6% higher reducing sugar concentration than the batch process during hydrolysis of high solidliquid ratio of 1: 0.5 (w/w). Our results are also in accordance with the earlier work of Chen et al, where in the enzymatic saccharification of corncob high hydrolysis yield and reducing sugar concentration was achieved through fed batch process (Chen et al 2007). In fed batch process, solid was added after the previous solid was completed or partially liquefied, which improved the mass and heat transfer significantly and generated high enzymatic digestibility and reducing sugar concentration.…”
Section: Fed Batch Enzymatic Hydrolysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ethanol production by FBP-SSF at 20% solid could produce ethanol of 35.76 g/L or 4.6% (v/v), which was close to benchmark level (above 4.0% (v/v)). This may be economically viable to produce in large scale [5,16,17]. The result showed that ethanol production by FBP-SSF was a good manner for cellulosic ethanol production.…”
Section: Effect Of Commercial Cellulase Enzymes On Ethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Zhu et al [15] used liquefaction at 50 °C for 120 h before ethanol production by SSF. Although it could give high ethanol concentration over the benchmark level (above 4.0% (v/v)) [5,16,17], it might be economically viable to produce in large scale. However, almost of material pretreatment was used in high severity condition, especially high temperature, such as Chu et al [9] pretreated corn stover at 190 °C for 3 min, Zhu et al [15] pretreated aspen at 170 °C for 10 min, and Albuquerque-Wanderley et al [18] pretreated sugarcane bagasse at 200 °C for 7 min.…”
Section: Effect Of Commercial Cellulase Enzymes On Ethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5C). Sornvoraveat and Kongkiattikajorn (2010) obtained a 96.07% ethanol yield from fermentation of enzymatic hydrolyzate of water hyacinth and Chen et al (2007) obtained a 94.0% yield from corncob enzymatic hydrolyzate in 18.0 h, by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nigam (2002) and Magdum et al, (2012) reported 18.0 g/L and 19.2g/L of ethanol from the acid hydrolyzate of water hyacinth leaves, respectively.…”
Section: Ethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%