2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme co-immobilization: Always the biocatalyst designers' choice…or not?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
218
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 324 publications
6
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[215][216][217][218][219][220][221] However, co-immobilization, that is, the immobilization of two or more enzymes on the same particle, has advantages but also has some serious drawbacks that in many instances are not taken into account. 222 Among the clearest advantages, we can note the shortening of the induction time for the second enzyme to act, which increases the initial rate of the global process 105,106 (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Use Of Catalases and Glucose Oxidase To Produce D-gluconic Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[215][216][217][218][219][220][221] However, co-immobilization, that is, the immobilization of two or more enzymes on the same particle, has advantages but also has some serious drawbacks that in many instances are not taken into account. 222 Among the clearest advantages, we can note the shortening of the induction time for the second enzyme to act, which increases the initial rate of the global process 105,106 (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Use Of Catalases and Glucose Oxidase To Produce D-gluconic Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some instances, this is a requirement not related to the shortening of the reaction course, but with the final yields, e.g., when some of the intermediate products are not stable and can lead to another compound different from the target, producing a decrease in the reaction yield and a complication on the final purification of the target compound, as contaminant compounds will appear in the final reaction medium [35,44]. However, as recently reviewed, co-immobilization presents many problems (e.g., necessity of using the same support surface, different stability of the coimmobilized enzymes) [190,191], and the researcher must analyzed if the co-immobilization problems compensate the advantages (for a revision of this topic, consult [192].…”
Section: Enzyme Co-immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, also some coimmobilized biocatalysts of protease and lipases were prepared, for non-cascade reactions [193]. These biocatalysts, called multipurpose biocatalyst [195][196][197], have unclear advantages and many disadvantages [192].…”
Section: Enzyme Co-immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipases co-immobilization raised some kinetic advantages in cascade reactions, as all the enzymes are exposed to high concentrations of the intermediate products from the first time of the reaction, eliminating the usual lag time in these processes [65,66]. However, conventional co-immobilization has some problems, like the fact that all enzymes must be immobilized on the same support surface using the same chemistry, and that, if the stabilities of the enzymes greatly differ under operational conditions, all immobilized enzymes must be discarded after the inactivation of the least stable enzyme even when the other enzymes maintain their full initial activities [65,67]. This seems just a technological problem, but it can prevent the industrial implementation of co-immobilized lipases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems just a technological problem, but it can prevent the industrial implementation of co-immobilized lipases. Usually, different long term enzyme stability problem on the design of co-immobilized enzymes is ignored [65,67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%