2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cc07036a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-free amplified DNA assay: five orders of linearity provided by metal stable isotope detection

Abstract: The metal stable isotope detection strategy demonstrates a wide linear range and a low detection limit, showing promising potential in clinical diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with spectroscopic-technique-based biosensors, mass spectrometry has the advantage of excellent specificity. However, its detection limit for direct detection of miRNA is generally in the nanomolar level. , One of the main reasons for the relatively low sensitivity of mass spectrometry for miRNAs is the low ionization efficiency of miRNAs. , Various methods including organic mass tags, metal element labeling, and isothermal amplification are used to increase the ionization efficiency and enhance the sensitivity for miRNA detection. Among them, metal nanoparticles are quite promising mass tags offering high detection sensitivity because of the presence of many thousands of metal atoms in a single metal nanoparticle of a 10 nm diameter. Although the sensitivity problem of mass spectrometry for miRNA detection is effectively solved by mass tagging techniques, its specificity is lost since the mass spectral signals come from the mass tags instead of miRNAs themselves, and the discrimination between the target miRNAs from nontarget ones with SNPs is based on the differences in their mass spectral intensities. Mass spectrometric methods possessing both high sensitivity and specificity are highly desired for the detection of miRNAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with spectroscopic-technique-based biosensors, mass spectrometry has the advantage of excellent specificity. However, its detection limit for direct detection of miRNA is generally in the nanomolar level. , One of the main reasons for the relatively low sensitivity of mass spectrometry for miRNAs is the low ionization efficiency of miRNAs. , Various methods including organic mass tags, metal element labeling, and isothermal amplification are used to increase the ionization efficiency and enhance the sensitivity for miRNA detection. Among them, metal nanoparticles are quite promising mass tags offering high detection sensitivity because of the presence of many thousands of metal atoms in a single metal nanoparticle of a 10 nm diameter. Although the sensitivity problem of mass spectrometry for miRNA detection is effectively solved by mass tagging techniques, its specificity is lost since the mass spectral signals come from the mass tags instead of miRNAs themselves, and the discrimination between the target miRNAs from nontarget ones with SNPs is based on the differences in their mass spectral intensities. Mass spectrometric methods possessing both high sensitivity and specificity are highly desired for the detection of miRNAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a method of choice for longtime stable analysis, ICPMS is prevalent in metal elements and metal nanoparticles research, thanks to its longtime signal stability, high sensitivity, wide dynamic range, and absolute quantification feature traceable to primary SI units . ICPMS has been widely used for the measurement of metal containing nanoparticles, metal isotopes, metal elements, and biomolecules after metal stable isotope tagging. Besides excellent luminescent properties, the DNA-templeted CuNPs intrinsically comprising a large amount of copper isotopes ( 63 Cu and 65 Cu), which can be efficiently and long-term stably detected by elemental mass spectrometry . Exonuclease I (Exo I), a widely used 3′-termini specific exonulease for ssDNA, was selected as a modal analyte.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%