1996
DOI: 10.1016/0260-8774(94)00078-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme inactivation in a droplet forming a bubble during drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the falling rate period, a permeable crust was formed and the droplet temperature rose towards the drybulb temperature of the air. If the partial pressure of moisture vapour at the droplet centre exceeded ambient pressure and thus resulted in a bubble formation and increase in the temperature of droplet inflated to an outer radius and finally yields in irregular random shaped particle (Etzel et al 1996). In the case of stem, the strong crust restricted the water vapour diffusion as well as bubble inflated thus, resulted in high moisture content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the falling rate period, a permeable crust was formed and the droplet temperature rose towards the drybulb temperature of the air. If the partial pressure of moisture vapour at the droplet centre exceeded ambient pressure and thus resulted in a bubble formation and increase in the temperature of droplet inflated to an outer radius and finally yields in irregular random shaped particle (Etzel et al 1996). In the case of stem, the strong crust restricted the water vapour diffusion as well as bubble inflated thus, resulted in high moisture content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of the work was carried out using various enzymes by Wijlhuizen, Kerkhof, and Bruin (1979), Liou, Luyben, and Bruin (1985), Yamamoto and Sano (1982), Meerdink and Van't Riet (1995) and Etzel, Suen, Halverson, and Budijono (1996). Several publications were also reported for inactivation of micro-organisms (Elizondo & Labuza, 1974;Fu & Etzel, 1995;Johnson & Etzel, 1993;Lievense et al, 1992) in the context of drying processes.…”
Section: A Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fundamental structure of microorganisms and enzymes are somewhat different and hence they may have different responses and stability against drying-induced stresses during processing. In the literature, inactivation for enzymes and micro-organisms has been mathematically worked out using the same approach considering the first-order reaction kinetics (Etzel et al, 1996;Li et al, 2006;Meerdink & Van't Riet, 1995). In fact, inactivation kinetics models have been interchangeably used for enzymes and micro-organisms and also for protein denaturation.…”
Section: Further Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strategy that might be followed to retain maximum enzyme activity is to minimize the presence of enzyme in the centre of the droplet. This can for example be achieved by drying the enzyme in a droplet that forms a hollow sphere upon drying (Etzel et al 1996) or by applying a coating of a concentrated enzyme solution on pre-dried particles.…”
Section: Predicting the Residual Enzyme Activity After Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%