1992
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.1860060409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme‐linked immunoadsorbent assay for the detection of cytomegalovirus‐IgM: Comparison between eight commercial kits, immunofluorescence, and immunoblotting

Abstract: Eight commercially available enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific IgM were used in parallel to determine the presence of CMV-IgM in 123 serum samples from pregnant women. The results obtained with the eight kits were compared. Based on concordance of six or more of the eight kits, we assessed sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement, as well as incidence of false-positive and -negative results for each kit. The results obtained by ELISA were th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of identifiable risk factors for CMV IgM may be due to the relatively low number of observations (3.0% prevalence for IgM), and because over 80% of the IgM reactivity in our population sample was high avidity and thus presumably from nonprimary CMV infection, which may be less associated with identifiable risk than primary infection. In addition, a portion of the IgM-positive sera may have been false-positive determinations known to occur with CMV IgM testing (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of identifiable risk factors for CMV IgM may be due to the relatively low number of observations (3.0% prevalence for IgM), and because over 80% of the IgM reactivity in our population sample was high avidity and thus presumably from nonprimary CMV infection, which may be less associated with identifiable risk than primary infection. In addition, a portion of the IgM-positive sera may have been false-positive determinations known to occur with CMV IgM testing (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional ELISA and immunofluorescence indirect assays were used for the detection of both IgM and IgG to rubella, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus and Toxoplasma gondii, as described before 11,14,17,37 . Only 28 samples were tested by standard seroagglutination to detect Brucella spp antibodies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional ELISA was used for the detection of both IgM and IgG to measles, rubella, parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus, as previously reported 2,9,12,31,44 . Samples were also tested by haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assay 22 for the determination of antibodies to Mayaro, Oropouche and dengue viruses, which are wellknown viral agents of exanthematous illnesses in the Amazon region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%