1980
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-70-746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Pierce's Disease Bacteria in Plant Tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunoglobulins were purified by precipitation with 50% saturated ammonium sulfate and by dialysis (35). Dilutions of rabbit antibody for ELISA reactions were done as described previously (29). Ascitic fluid immunoglobulins were diluted 1:1,200, 1:2,400, and 1:4,800.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoglobulins were purified by precipitation with 50% saturated ammonium sulfate and by dialysis (35). Dilutions of rabbit antibody for ELISA reactions were done as described previously (29). Ascitic fluid immunoglobulins were diluted 1:1,200, 1:2,400, and 1:4,800.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XLB, also referred to as rickettsia-like bacteria, have been isolated from diseased plants, insect vectors, and apparently healthy reservoir plants (8,15,26), indicating a complexity of XLB-host-vector interactions. Studies on etiology (14, 15, 191, culture requirements (6, 8, 25), serology (7,12,20,22,26), and certain biochemical characteristics (15, 24) have indicated that the XLB are not related to the major phytopathogen-containing genera of gram-negative bacteria and can be subdivided into at least two closely related subgroups of unknown taxonomic distinction or affiliation.In this study, the relatedness of several XLB to each other and to other gram-negative phytopathogens was examined and defined by the following three criteria: deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) base composition, genome molecular weight, and DNA homology.(The results were taken from a thesis presented by S.M.K. to Florida State University, Tallahassee.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the classification of X. fastidiosa subspecies, X. fastidiosa was identified by a variety of techniques including: microscopy, culturing, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR), RAPD fingerprinting and western blotting [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Both microscopy and culturing are slow and relatively inaccurate methods for identification of X. fastidiosa and do not allow for identification of specific subspecies [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%