2019
DOI: 10.1101/711069
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme stoichiometry indicates the variation of microbial nutrient requirements at different soil depths in subtropical forests

Abstract: 2Soil extracellular enzyme activities and associated enzymatic stoichiometry are considered 3 indicators to nutrients availability and microbial substrate limitation. However, many of current studies 4 have been focusing on upper most soil layer with a single enzyme as represent, leading to critical 5 uncertainties in understanding the nutrient availability in deeper soils. In this study, we investigated 6 C-, N-and P-acquiring enzyme activities and microbial C, N and P limitation across a range of soil 7 laye… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation was made by Liu et al. (2020) in subtropical soils of China. Overall, under laboratory incubation conditions in which all soils were subjected to standardized moisture, oxygen, and temperature, we found a high proportion of potentially labile C in tropical subsoils (Figure 1e−h).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar observation was made by Liu et al. (2020) in subtropical soils of China. Overall, under laboratory incubation conditions in which all soils were subjected to standardized moisture, oxygen, and temperature, we found a high proportion of potentially labile C in tropical subsoils (Figure 1e−h).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Overall, explanatory variables (i.e., rPCs) did not explain the variance in microbial investment in C and P acquisition to a greater extent (Table 2). This indicates that microbial resource acquisition is complex and could strongly depend on other factors that were not accounted for in this study, such as microbial physiology, substrate stoichiometry, and microbial community composition (Cui et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020; Stone et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Grazing increases labile C inputs in YNP (Hamilton III & Frank, 2001; Hamilton III, Frank, Hinchey, & Murray, 2008) which may have stimulated soil microbial decomposition of relatively recalcitrant C (Frank et al, 2002; Vestergård, Reinsch, Bengtson, Ambus, & Christensen, 2016; Wilson et al, 2018). Second, progressive changes in microbial community composition and extracellular enzymes could contribute to the degradation of recalcitrant C pool (Liu, Chen, Chen, Guo, & Li, 2020; Mueller et al, 2017; Stark et al, 2015). Third, herbivores may have increased the degradation of the recalcitrant soil C pool by their dung and urine inputs (Blagodatsky et al, 2010; Piñeiro, Paruelo, Oesterheld, & Jobbágy, 2010) or trampling and fragmenting organic material (Kauffman, Thorpe, & Brookshire, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants and soil microorganisms preferentially invest metabolic resources to acquire nutrients that limit their growth (Bragg, 2012; Johnson, Wilson, Bowker, Wilson, & Miller, 2010; Marklein & Houlton, 2012). Soil phosphatases are enzymes produced by both plants and soil microorganisms to catalyze the hydrolysis of ester‐phosphate bonds and phosphoric acid anhydrides, releasing orthophosphate that can be taken up across living cell membranes (Liu, Chen, Chen, Guo, & Li, 2020; Margalef et al., 2017; Vance, Uhde Stone, & Allan, 2003). The production of extracellular phosphatases is generally assumed to indicate P limitation of both plant and microbial growth (Jian et al., 2016; Marklein & Houlton, 2012; Vitousek, Porder, Houlton, & Chadwick, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%