2015
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eosinophilic pseudotumor of the liver: Report of six cases and review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, imaging or biochemical studies done for other reasons may show liver abnormalities. Biochemistry studies are significant for elevations of GGT, ALP, and bilirubin, while aminotransferases are usually within normal limits [5][6]. Imaging studies of liver may show solitary or multiple nodular lesions of low densities [5], diffuse hepatomegaly, periportal signal abnormalities, and dilation of biliary ducts and wall thickening [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, imaging or biochemical studies done for other reasons may show liver abnormalities. Biochemistry studies are significant for elevations of GGT, ALP, and bilirubin, while aminotransferases are usually within normal limits [5][6]. Imaging studies of liver may show solitary or multiple nodular lesions of low densities [5], diffuse hepatomegaly, periportal signal abnormalities, and dilation of biliary ducts and wall thickening [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, no significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the two groups. Combining the two groups of data, isolated liver involvement was found to be rare (ncombined = 3/81, 3.7%), and the majority of patients had multisystem LCH (ncombined = 78/81, 96.3%); there were more adult patients (ncombined = 52/87, 59.8%) with liver involvement than pediatric For comparison with the present study group, 24 articles with 67 patients with comparatively eligible data were enrolled in the reference group [4,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][42][43][44] (Figure 1). Due to missing data in the reference group, available data on hepatomegaly (n reference = 47, n combined = 67), biochemical liver abnormalities (n reference = 53, n combined = 73), and stratification (n reference = 61, n combined = 81) were analyzed separately.…”
Section: Patients and Clinical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Detailed imaging examinations are listed in Table S1. For comparison with the present study group, 24 articles with 67 patients with comparatively eligible data were enrolled in the reference group [4,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][42][43][44] (Figure 1). Due to missing data in the reference group, available data on hepatomegaly (nreference = 47, ncombined = 67), biochemical liver abnormalities (nreference = 53, ncombined = 73), and stratification (nreference = 61, ncombined = 81) were analyzed separately.…”
Section: Patients and Clinical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation